Page 60 - ASME DSCC 2015 Program
P. 60

Technical Program




                                                                     Stabilization of nonlinear Systems By Switched lyapunov function
              ConTRIBuTED SESSIon
              1-9-1  TP3  Advances in non-linear and optimal Control   Contributed regular paper. DSCC2015-9650
              George Bellows E                        4:00pm–6:00pm  Andy Zelenak, The University of Texas at Austin, Fort Collins, CO, United
                                                                     States, Mitch Pryor, The University of Texas at Austin, XX, TX, United States
              Session Chair: Warren White, Kansas State University
                                                                     Stabilization of Nonlinear Systems By Switched Lyapunov Function
              Session Co-Chair: Atul Kelkar, Iowa State University
                                                                     Model free Approaches Applied to the Control of nonlinear Systems: A
              Combined Input Shaping and feedback Control of a Double-Pendulum   Brief Survey With Special Attention to Intelligent PID Iterative learning
              System Subject to External Disturbances                Control
              Contributed regular paper. DSCC2015-9849               Contributed regular paper. DSCC2015-9721
              Robert Mar, Anurag Goyal, Vinh nguyen, Tianle Yang, William Singhose,   Elmira Madadi, Duisburg-Essen University, Duiburg, Germany, dirk Söffker,
              Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States  University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
              A control system combining input shaping and feedback is applied to a dou-  Model-based control is one of the popular solutions for designing a control-
              ble-pendulum bridge crane subjected to external disturbances. The external   ler used to control nonlinear systems. However, the difficulty of obtaining
              disturbances represent naturally occurring forces, such as gusting winds.   an accurate model is a challenge for control designers. For this reason
              The proposed control method achieves fast point-to-point response similar   model-free control (MFC) methods are attractive. This contribution gives an
              to open-loop input-shaping control. It also minimizes transient deflections   overview on different types of model-free control. It includes an investiga-
              and disturbance-induced residual swing using the feedback control. Effects   tion about model-free techniques applied to nonlinear systems. In detail the
              of parameters such as the mass ratio of the double-pendulum, suspension   iPID iterative learning-based method is expressed more detailed. Simula-
              length ratio, and the traveled distance were studied via numerical simulation   tion results also illustrate a successful application and performance of the
              and hardware experiments. The controller effectively suppresses the distur-  proposed method.
              bances and is robust to modeling uncertainties and task variations.
                                                                     long Time Average Cost Control of Polynomial Systems: A Sum-of-
              Tracking Control of non-Minimum Phase Systems using filtered Basis   Squares-Based Small-feedback approach
              functions: A nuRBS-Based Approach                      Contributed regular paper. DSCC2015-9684
              Contributed regular paper. DSCC2015-9859               deqing huang, Sergei chernyshenko, Imperial College London, London,
              Molong Duan, Keval Ramani, Chinedum okwudire, University of Michigan,   United Kingdom
              Ann Arbor, MI, United States
                                                                     This paper provides a proof of concept of the recent novel idea in the area
              This paper proposes an approach for minimizing tracking errors in systems with   of long-time average cost control. Meanwhile, a new method of
              non-minimum phase (NMP) zeros by using filtered basis functions. The output of   overcoming the well-known difficulty of non-convexity of simultaneous
              the tracking controller is represented as a linear combination of basis functions   optimization of a control law and an additional tunable function is given.
              having unknown coefficients. The basis functions are forward filtered using the   First, a recently-proposed method of obtaining rigorous bounds of
              dynamics of the NMP system and their coefficients selected to minimize the   long-time average cost is outlined for the uncontrolled system with
              errors in tracking a given trajectory. The control designer is free to choose any   polynomials of system state on the right-hand side. In this method the
              suitable set of basis functions but, in this paper, a set of basis functions derived   polynomial constraints are relaxed to be sum-of-squares and formulated
              from the widely-used non uniform rational B-spline (NURBS) curve is employed.   as semi-definite programs.   It was proposed to use the upper bound of
              Analyses and illustrative examples are presented to demonstrate the effective-  long-time average cost as the objective function instead of the time-
              ness of the proposed approach in comparison to popular approximate model   average cost itself in controller design. In the present paper this
              inversion methods like zero phase error tracking control.  suggestion is implemented for a particular system and is shown to give
                                                                     good results.
              escape regions of the active Target defense differential game
                                                                     Designing the optimal controller by this method requires optimising simulta-
              Contributed regular paper. DSCC2015-9628
                                                                     neously both the control law and a tunable function similar to the Lyapunov
              Eloy Garcia, Infoscitex Corp., Dayton, OH, United States, David W. Casbeer,   function. The new approach proposed and implemented in this paper for
              AFRL Aerospace Systems Directorate, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, United   overcoming the inherent non-convexity of this optimisation is based on a
              States, Meir Pachter, Air Force Institute of Technology, Dayton, OH, United
              States                                                 formal assumption that the amplitude of control is small. By expanding the
                                                                     tunable function and the bound in the small parameter, the long-time aver-
              The active target defense differential game is addressed in this paper. In this   age cost is reduced by minimizing the respective bound in each term of the
              differential game an Attacker missile pursues a Target aircraft. The aircraft is   series. The derivation of all the polynomial coefficients in controller is given
              however aided by a Defender missile launched by, say, the wingman, to inter-  in terms of the solvability conditions of state-dependent linear and bilinear
              cept the Attacker before it reaches the Target aircraft. Thus, a team is formed   inequalities. The resultant sum-of-squares problems are solved in sequence,
              by the Target and the Defender which cooperate to maximize the separation   thus avoiding the non-convexity in optimization.
              between the Target aircraft and the point where the Attacker missile is intercept-
              ed by the Defender missile, while the Attacker simultaneously tries to minimize
              said distance. This paper focuses on characterizing the set of coordinates such
         60   that if the Target’s initial position belong to this set then its survival is guaranteed
              if both the Target and the Defender follow their optimal strategies. Such optimal
              strategies are presented in this paper as well.
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65