Page 197 - American Stories, A History of the United States
P. 197

example, speculators rushed to rural areas to buy loan certificates from unsuspecting citizens
              7.1    Quick Check                at bargain prices. To backcountry farmers, making money without physical labor appeared
                     How did Hamilton justify the   immoral, un-republican, and un-American. When the greed of a former Treasury official
                       creation of the Bank of the    led to several serious bankruptcies in 1792, ordinary citizens began to listen more closely to
                     United States?
              7.2                               what Madison, Jefferson, and their associates were saying about corruption in high places.
                                                Setback for Hamilton

              7.3                               In his third major report, Report on Manufactures, submitted to Congress in December
                                                1791, Hamilton revealed the final details of his grand design for the economic future
                                                of the United States. This lengthy document suggested ways the federal government
              7.4                               might stimulate manufacturing. To free itself from dependence on European imports,
                                                Hamilton observed, the country had to develop its own industry—textile mills, for
                                                example. Without government intervention, however, the process would take decades.
              7.5                               Americans would continue to invest in agriculture. But protective tariffs and industrial
                                                bounties would accelerate the growth of a balanced economy. With proper planning,
                                                the United States would soon hold its own with Britain and France.
                                                    In Congress, the battle lines were drawn. Hamilton’s opponents—not yet a disci-
                                                plined party but a loose coalition of men who shared Madison’s and Jefferson’s mis-
                                                givings about the secretary’s program—ignored his economic arguments. Instead, they
                                                engaged him on moral and political grounds. Madison railed against the dangers of
                                                “consolidation,” which threatened to concentrate power in the federal government,
                                                leaving the states defenseless.
                                                    Jefferson attacked the Report on Manufactures from a different angle. He assumed—
                                                largely because Europe’s urban poverty had horrified him—that cities breed vice. The
                                                government, Jefferson argued, should not promote their development. He believed that
                                                Hamilton’s proposal guaranteed that American workers would leave the countryside
                                                and crowd into urban centers: “I think our government will remain virtuous for many
                                                centuries as long as they [the people] are chiefly agricultural … When they get piled
                     Quick Check                upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, they will become corrupt as in Europe.”
                     Why did Congress reject    Southern congressmen also saw tariffs and bounties as vehicles for enriching Hamil-
                     Hamilton’s Report on       ton’s northern friends at the planters’ expense. The recommendations in the Report on
                     Manufactures?
                                                Manufactures were soundly defeated in the House of Representatives.

                                                charges of Treason: The battle Over

                                                Foreign Affairs




                                                  7.3    How did foreign affairs affect domestic politics during the 1790s?
                                               D         uring Washington’s second term (1793–1797), war in Europe thrust foreign

                                                         affairs into the forefront of American life. The impact of this development on
                                                         domestic politics was devastating. Officials who had disagreed on economic
                                                         policy now began to identify their interests with either Britain or France,
                                                Europe’s most powerful nations. Political differences, however trivial, were suddenly
                                                cited as evidence that one group or the other had entered into treasonous correspon-
                                                dence with external enemies eager to compromise the independence and prosperity of
                                                the United States.
                                                    Formal political organizations—the Federalists and Republicans—were born in this
                                                poisonous atmosphere. The clash between the groups developed over how best to pre-
                                                serve the new republic. The Republicans (Jeffersonians) advocated states’ rights, strict
                                                interpretation of the Constitution, friendship with France, and vigilance against “the
                                                avaricious, monopolizing Spirit of Commerce and Commercial Men.” The  Federalists
                                                urged a strong national government, central economic planning, closer ties with Britain,
                                                and maintenance of public order, even if that meant calling out federal troops.
                  164
   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202