Page 249 - Environment: The Science Behind the Stories
P. 249

THe SCIeNCe   BeHIND THe SToRy





                     Can No-Till Farming                                                  was no significant difference among
                     Help Us Fight                                                        the plots—and thus no evidence for
                                                                                          the offsetting hypothesis. They also
                     Climate Change?                                                      found that plots of mature forest that
                                                                                          had never been cleared for agriculture
                     As concern over global climate change                                held more carbon than either type of
                     has grown, many agricultural scien-                                  cropped plot.
                     tists have touted no-till farming as one                                In Georgia, Scott Devine and three
                     part of the solution. Climate change                                 colleagues dug 2 meters deep and
                     (Chapter 18) is driven by our emission                               analyzed soil samples from long-term
                     of greenhouse gases, such as carbon                                  experimental fields at a site in Athens
                     dioxide, which warm the atmosphere.                                  called Horseshoe Bend. Working with
                     Because no-till farming reduces soil                                 data collected yearly since 1982, they
                     disturbance, proponents argue that it                                found that no-till plots contained sig-
                     returns crop residue to the soil faster                              nificantly more carbon in the topmost
                     than soil organisms decompose such                                   soil layer (0–5 cm depth), but that each
                     organic matter and emit carbon dioxide   Technician taking a soil sample,    layer below that showed no significant
                     by respiration (p. 50). In this way, the   Columbus, Ohio.           difference between plowed and no-till
                     argument goes, no-till farming could                                 plots (Figure 1). In 2011 they reported
                     serve as one method of carbon seques-                                that, overall, no-till plots and forested
                     tration or carbon storage (pp. 526, 555).  from conventional plowing to no-till   land held 20% more carbon than con-
                        An avalanche of research papers   farming would reduce emissions by   ventionally plowed land.
                     shows that no-till methods increase soil   30–35 kg C/ha per season. Yet in
                     organic carbon (SOC) in the topsoil,   2008, Lal and colleague Humberto
                     and some policymakers were becoming   Blanco-Canqui analyzed soil samples   0
                     persuaded that polluters should begin   down to 60 cm (2 ft) on farms in Ohio,
                     paying no-till farmers in carbon-trading   Pennsylvania, and Kentucky, and they
                     markets (pp. 530–531) to offset the pol-  concluded that no-till fields often have   50  At shallow depths,
                     luters’ emissions.                less carbon at deeper levels than con-            plots vary in carbon
                                                                                                         content
                        Then some researchers began to   ventionally plowed fields.
                     dig deeper. Literally. A number of soil   Were no-till farming’s carbon gains       At deeper depths,
                     scientists noticed that very few studies   in the topsoil, then, offset by carbon   Depth (cm)  100  plots have equivalent
                     were measuring the organic matter in   losses deeper in the soil profile? Many      carbon content
                     soil below a depth of 30 cm (1 foot).   researchers began testing this hypoth-
                     Yet SOC makes its way downward    esis. Among them were researchers    150            Conventional till
                     over time, and many crop plants’ roots   in Michigan and in Georgia who took          No-till
                     reach deeper than this. These scientists   advantage of long-term research pro-       Forest succession
                     wondered whether no-till farming was   grams at university-run sites.  200
                     increasing SOC at deeper levels in the   At the W.K. Kellogg Biological    0    5    10   15   20
                     soil. If not, then we’d better invest our   Station in Michigan, S.P. Syswerda   Total SOC (g/kg of soil)
                     efforts elsewhere in the urgent search   and four colleagues took soil sam-
                     for climate change solutions.     ples down to 1 meter in depth from   Figure 1 in a georgia study, no-till plots
                        One researcher to raise ques-  experimental farm plots established in   contained more carbon in the topsoil than
                     tions was Rattan Lal of The Ohio State   1988. They reported in 2011 that plots   conventionally plowed plots, while for-
                                                                                          ested plots had the most. At deeper soil
                     University. Lal had been one of the   under no-till farming (as well as plots   levels, there was no significant difference.
                     foremost promoters of the idea that   under organic farming (pp. 275–278)   Data from Devine, Scott, et al., 2011. Soil carbon
                     farmers could help fight climate change   held significantly more carbon at shal-  change through 2 m during forest succession
                     by using conservation tillage. In a 2004   low depths than did conventionally   alongside a 30-year agroecosystem experiment.
                     paper, Lal calculated that converting   plowed plots. At lower depths, there   Forest Science 57: 36–50.







             248







           M09_WITH7428_05_SE_C09.indd   248                                                                                    12/12/14   2:59 PM
   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254