Page 247 - Environment: The Science Behind the Stories
P. 247

methods on over half their farmland. According to U.S. govern-
                                                          1  Cut furrow   ment figures, erosion rates in the United States declined from
                                                                          9.1 tons/ha (3.7 tons/acre) in 1982 to 5.9 tons/ha (2.4 tons/acre)
                                                                          in 2003, thanks to conservation tillage and other soil conserva-
                                                                          tion measures.
                                                                             No-till and  conservation tillage methods  were  pio-
                                                                          neered in the United States and the United Kingdom, but are
                                                                          now most widespread in subtropical and temperate South
                                                                          America. In Brazil, Argentina, and Paraguay, over half of all
                                                                          cropland is now under no-till cultivation. In this part of the
                                                                          world, heavy rainfall promotes erosion, causing tilled soils
                                                                          to lose organic matter and nutrients, and hot weather can
                                                                          overheat tilled soil. Thus, the no-till approach is especially
                                                                          helpful here, and results have exceeded those in the United
                       2  Drop seed                     3  Close furrow   States: Crop yields increased (in some cases they nearly
                         in furrow                         over seed      doubled), erosion was reduced, soil quality was enhanced,
                                                                          and pollution declined, all while costs to farmers dropped
                                                                          by roughly 50%.
                     Figure 9.16  Farmers practice no-till farming with a no-till   Critics of no-till farming in the United States note that
                     drill. The drill  1  cuts a furrow through the soil surface,  2  drops   this approach often requires heavy use of chemical herbi-
                     in a seed, and  3  closes the furrow over the seed.  cides (because weeds are not physically removed from fields)
                                                                          and synthetic fertilizer (because non-crop plants take up a
                                                                          significant portion of soil nutrients). In many industrialized
                     adding organic matter to the soil, no-till farming captures car-  countries, this has indeed been the case. Proponents, however,
                     bon that otherwise would make its way to the atmosphere and   point out that in developing regions of South America, farm-
                     instead stores it in the soil. In addition, because no-till farming   ers have departed from the industrialized model by relying
                     reduces tractor use, the farmer burns less gasoline. Some farm-  more heavily on  green manures (dead plants as fertilizer)
                     ers have even received money from carbon offsets (p. 531) for   and by rotating fields with cover crops, including nitrogen-
                     using no-till methods. Researchers today are debating just how   fixing legumes. The manures and legumes nourish the soil,
                     much impact no-till farming can have on carbon sequestra-  and cover crops reduce weeds by taking up space the weeds
                     tion (see THe SCieNCe beHiND THe STOrY, pp. 248–249).  might occupy.
                        In the United States today, nearly one-quarter of farm-  Critics  counter  that  green  manures  are  generally  not
                     land is under no-till cultivation, and over 40% is farmed using   practical for large-scale intensive agriculture. Certainly,
                     conservation tillage (Figure 9.17). Forty percent of soybeans,   conservation tillage methods work better in some areas than
                     21% of corn, and 18% of cotton receive no-till treatment. Iowa   in others, and better with some crops than with others. Farm-
                     ranks second only to Illinois in total area under no-till farming,   ers will do best by educating themselves on the options and
                     but its rate of no-till farming (23%) is close to the national aver-  choosing what is best for their particular crops on their own
                     age. Tennessee, Virginia, Maryland, and Kentucky use no-till   land.



                                                                           WeIGHING THe ISSUeS

                                                                           HoW WoULD yoU FARm?  You are a farmer owning land on
                      Table 9.1  benefits of No-Till Farming               both sides of a steep ridge. You want to plant a sun-loving
                      •   Reduces erosion                                  crop on the sunny, but very windy, south slope of the ridge and
                      •   Helps soil retain moisture                       a crop that needs a great deal of irrigation on the north slope.
                      •   Enhances soil structure                          What farming techniques might best conserve your soil? What
                      •   Reduces soil compaction                          factors might you want to know about before you decide to
                                                                           commit to one or more methods?
                      •   Stores carbon in soil, lessening its release to the atmosphere
                      •   Improves biological activity in soil
                      •   Helps soil retain nutrients
                      •   Cuts down on water and air pollution            Plant cover is the key to erosion control
                      •   Requires less time and labor
                                                                          Farming methods to control erosion make use of the general
                      •   Decreases fossil fuel use and costs
                                                                          principle that protecting and restoring vegetative cover will
                      •   Minimizes wear and tear on equipment
                                                                          protect soils, and this principle is applied widely beyond
                      •     Tends to increase long-term soil productivity, crop yields,   farming. When grazing livestock, people try to move animals
                         and farming profit                               from place to place before the plant cover in any one area is
             246







           M09_WITH7428_05_SE_C09.indd   246                                                                                    12/12/14   2:59 PM
   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252