Page 523 - Using MIS
P. 523

Q7 2025?       491

                                       nothing in license fees for the full-service operations application that it obtains from the SaaS
                                       vendor MindBody, Inc. Instead, all of the credit card charges that The Firm customers make
                                       are processed by MindBody, Inc. This processing enables MindBody to earn a small amount
                                       on every customer transaction. MindBody supports more than 6,000 studios and trainers in the
                                       United States. Its software is a veritable money machine.
                                           A key element of this new business model is the alignment between the goals of work-
                                       out  studios  and  MindBody.  Both  make  more  money  when  customers  purchase.  Therefore,
                                       MindBody’s software includes features and functions that enable studio managers to determine
                                       which products, classes, trainers, and even ads and marketing campaigns are the most success-
                                       ful. Furthermore, MindBody has a window on the best practices in the industry. To motivate
                                       studios to adapt to new practices that will create more revenue, MindBody provides compara-
                                       tive statistics on any given studio’s performance against that of similar companies in its region.
                                           MindBody’s business model is an example of a potentially monumental change in the way
                                       that business software is provided.
                                           But for all of this positive news, will we ever learn? We have known for more than 40 years
                                       that the key factor in informations systems success is active involvement by users. We’ve seen
                                       billion-dollar disasters play out for a lack of control over requirements. So, have we learned?
                                       Reread Case Study 7 and ask what single factor was responsible for the debacle in the Cover
                                       Oregon health exchange. The governor didn’t get involved and didn’t have anyone else manage
                                       the project, and the users fought with the development organization over requirements, which
                                       were never stabilized.
            That’s it! You’ve reached the end   So, it all comes down to the users. The positive four factors will help, but unless senior man-
            of this text. Take a moment to
            consider how you will use what   agement and users are actively involved in systems development projects, we will have many
            you learned, as described in the   more million- and billion-dollar disasters on our hands. You and your classmates can make a
            Guide on pages 494–495.    difference.
   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528