Page 354 - Essentials of Human Communication

References 333

Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (1990). A relationship-specific version Infante, D. A., & Rancer, A. S. (1995). Argumentativeness and ver-
of the love attitudes scale. In J. W. Heulip (Ed.), Handbook of bal aggressiveness: A review of recent theory and research. In
replication research in the behavioral and social sciences [Special B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook, 19 (pp. 319–351).
issue]. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 239–254. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S., Foote, F. H., & Slapion-Foote, M. J. Infante, D. A., Rancer, A. S., & Womack, D. F. (2003). Building
(1984). Do men and women love differently? Journal of communication theory (4th ed.). Prospect Heights, IL:
Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 177–195. Waveland Press.
Herrick, J. A. (2004). Argumentation: Understanding and shaping Infante, D. A., & Wigley, C. J. (1986). Verbal aggressiveness: An
arguments. State College, PA: Strata. interpersonal model and measure. Communication Mono-
Hersey, P., Blanchard, K. H., & Johnson, D. E. (2001). Manage- graphs, 53, 61–69.
ment of organizational behavior: Leading human resources Jacobson, D. (1999). Impression formation in cyberspace: Online ex-
(8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. pectations and offline experiences in text-based virtual commu-
Hesketh, B., & Neal, A. (2006). Using “war stories” to train for adap- nities. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 5.
tive performance: Is it better to learn from error or success? Ap- Jambor, E., & Elliott, M. (2005, Winter). Self-esteem and coping
plied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 282–302. strategies among deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and
Hewitt, J. P. (1998). The myth of self-esteem: Finding happiness and Deaf Education, 10, 63–81.
solving problems in America. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Jandt, F. E. (2010). Intercultural communication (6th ed.). Thou-
Hewitt, J., & Stokes, R. (1975). Disclaimers. American Sociological sand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Review, 40, 1–11. Janis, I. (1983). Victims of group thinking: A psychological study of
Himle, J. A., Abelson, J. L., & Haghightgou, H. (1999). Effect of foreign policy decisions and fiascoes (2nd ed.). Boston:
alcohol on social phobic anxiety. American Journal of Psychi- Houghton Mifflin.
atry, 156, 1237–1243. Jaworski, A. (1993). The power of silence: Social and pragmatic
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Bullying: Beyond the school- perspectives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
yard. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press/Sage. Jecker, J., & Landy, D. (1969). Liking a person as a function of do-
Hocker, J. L., & Wilmot, W. W. (1985). Interpersonal conflict (2nd ing him a favor. Human Relations, 22, 371–378.
ed.). Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown. Johannesen, R. L. (2001). Ethics in human communication (6th
Hocker, J. L., & Wilmot, W. W. (2007). Interpersonal conflict (7th ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. Johannesen, R. L., Valde, K. S., & Whedbee, K. E. (2007). Ethics in
Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and organizations: Software of the human communication (6th ed.). Prospect Heights, IL:
mind. New York: McGraw-Hill. Waveland.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Johansson, W., & Percy, W. A. (1994). Outing: Shattering the con-
organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: spiracy of silence. New York: Harrington Park Press.
McGraw-Hill. Johnson, C. E. (1987). An introduction to powerful and powerless
Hofstrand, D. (2006). Retrieved from http://www.extension talk in the classroom. Communication Education, 36, 167–172.
.iastate.edu Johnson, S. D., & Bechler, C. (1998). Examining the relationship
Hoft, N. L. (1995). International technical communication: How to between listening effectiveness and leadership emergence:
export information about high technology. New York: Wiley. Perceptions, behaviors, and recall. Small Group Research, 29,
Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men and politeness. New York: Longman. 452–471.
Hunt, M. O. (2000). Status, religion, and the “belief in a just Johnson, S. M., & O’Connor, E. (2002). The gay baby boom: The
world”: Comparing African Americans, Latinos, and whites. psychology of gay parenthood. New York: New York
Social Science Quarterly, 81, 325–343. University Press.
Huston, M., & Schwartz, P. (1995). The relationships of lesbians Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated com-
and gay men. In J. T. Wood, & S. Duck (Eds.), Under-studied munication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity.
relationships: Off the beaten track (pp. 89–121).. Thousand European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177–192.
Oaks, CA: Sage. Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., & Feinberg, D.
Iizuka, Y. (1993). Regulators in Japanese conversation. Psychologi- R. (2007). Social transmission of face preferences among humans.
cal Reports, 72, 203–209. Proceedings of the Royal Society 274 (March 22): 899–903.
Infante, D. A. (1988). Arguing constructively. Prospect Heights, Jones, C., Berry, L., & Stevens, C. (2007). Synthesized speech in-
IL: Waveland Press. telligibility and persuasion: Speech rate and non-native
Infante, D. A., & Rancer, A. (1982). A conceptualization and mea- listeners. Computer Speech and Language, 21, 641–651.
sure of argumentativeness. Journal of Personality Assessment, Jones, S. (2005). The touch-log record: A behavioral communica-
46, 72–80. tion measure. In V. Manusov (Ed.), The sourcebook of