Page 357 - Essentials of Human Communication

336 References

McCarthy, M. (2003, January). Talking back: “Small” interactional Miller, G. R. (1990). Interpersonal communication. In G. L.
response tokens in everyday conversation. Research on Lan- Dahnke & G. W. Clatterbuck (Eds.), Human communication:
guage and Social Interaction, 36, 33–63. Theory and research (pp. 91–122). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
McCroskey, J. C. (2006). An introduction to rhetorical communi- Miller, G. R., & Parks, M. R. (1982). Communication in dissolving
cation (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.), Personal relationships: Vol. 4.
McCroskey, J. C., & Wheeless, L. (1976). Introduction to human Dissolving personal relationships. New York: Academic Press.
communication. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Miller, L. R. (1997, December). Better ways to think and commu-
McDevitt, M., Kiousis, S., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2003). Spiral of mod- nicate. Association Management, 49, 71–73.
eration: Opinion expression in computer-mediated discussion. Moghaddam, F. M., Taylor, D. M., & Wright, S. C. (1993). Social psy-
International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15, 454–470. chology in cross-cultural perspective. New York: W. H. Freeman.
McDonald, E. J., McCabe, K., Yeh, M., Lau, A., Garland, A., & Molloy, J. (1981). Molloy’s live for success. New York: Bantam.
Hough, R. L. (2005). Cultural affiliation and self-esteem as Monin, B. (2003, December). The warm glow heuristic: When
predictors of internalizing symptoms among Mexican Amer- liking leads to familiarity. Journal of Personality and Social
ican adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 85, 1035–1048.
Psychology, 34, 163–171. Montagu, A. (1971). Touching: The human significance of the
McGill, M. E. (1985). The McGill report on male intimacy. skin. New York: Harper & Row.
New York: Harper & Row. Moon, D. G. (1996). Concepts of “culture”: Implications for inter-
McGinley, S. (2000). Children and lying. Retreived from http://www cultural communication research. Communication Quar-
.ag.arizona.edu/pubs/general/resrpt2000/childrenlying.pdf. terly, 44, 70–84.
McGlone, M. S., & Giles, H. (2011). Language and interpersonal Morreale, S. P., & Pearson, J. C. (2008, April). Why communica-
communication. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), The Sage tion education is important: The centrality of the discipline
handbook of interpersonal communication, 4th ed. (pp. 201– in the 21st century. Communication Education, 57, 224–240.
238). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Morrill, C. (1992). Vengeance among executives. Virginia Review
of Sociology, 1, 51–76.
McKerrow, R. E., Gronbeck, B. E., Ehninger, D., & Monroe, A. H.
(2000). Principles and types of speech communication (14th Morris, D. (1977). Manwatching: A field guide to human behav-
ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. ior. New York: Abrams.
McLain, G. (2011). Deadlier than war: Combating military sui- Motley, M. T. (1990a). On whether one can(not) not communi-
cides. In Larry Schnoor (Ed.), Winning Orations (pp. 21–23). cate: An examination via traditional communication postu-
Mankato, MN: Interstate Oratorical Association. lates. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 54, 1–20.
McNamee, S., & Gergen, K. J. (Eds.). (1999). Relational responsi- Motley, M. T. (1990b). Communication as interaction: A reply to
bility: Resources for sustainable dialogue. Thousand Oaks, Beach and Bavelas. Western Journal of Speech Communica-
CA: Sage. tion, 54, 613–623.
McNatt, D. B. (2001). Ancient Pygmalion joins contemporary Mottet, T., & Richmond, V. P. (1998). Verbal approach and avoid-
ance items. Communication Quarterly, 46, 25–40.
management: A meta-analysis of the result. Journal of Ap-
plied Psychology, 85, 314–322. Mullen, B., Salas, E., & Driskell, J. (1989). Salience, motivation,
and artifact as contributions to the relation between partici-
Mealy, M., Stephan, W., & Urritia, C. (2007). The acceptability of pation rate and leadership. Journal of Experimental Social
lies: A comparison of Ecuadorians and Euro-Americans. In- Psychology, 25, 545–559.
ternational Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 689–702.
Mehl, M. R., Vazire, S., Ramirez-Esparza, N., Slatcher, R. B., & Mullen, B., Tara, A., Salas, E., & Driskell, J. E. (1994). Group cohesive-
ness and quality of decision making: An interaction of tests of
Pennebaker, J. W. (2007, July). Are women really more talk- the groupthink hypothesis. Small Group Research, 25, 189–204.
ative than men? Science 6, 82.
Mullen, C. A. (2005). Mentorship primer. New York: Peter Lang.
Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. New
York: Free Press. Myers, K. K., Siebold, D. R., & Park, H. S. (2011). Interpersonal
communication in the workplace. In Knapp, M. L., & Daly,
Messick, R. M., & Cook, K. S. (Eds.). (1983). Equity theory: Psy- J. A. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of interpersonal communica-
chological and sociological perspectives. New York: Praeger. tion, 4th ed. (pp. 527–562). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Metts, S., & Planalp, S. (2002). Emotional communication. In M. L. Myers, S. A., & Zhong, M. (2004). Perceived Chinese instructor
Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal commu- use of affinity-seeking strategies and Chinese college student
nication (3rd ed., pp. 339–373). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. motivation. Journal of Intercultural Communication
Midooka, K. (1990). Characteristics of Japanese style communi- Research 33 (September–December), 119–130.
cation. Media Culture and Society, 12, 47–49. Napier, R. W., & Gershenfeld, M. K. (1989). Groups: Theory and
Miller, G. R. (1978). The current state of theory and research in experience (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
interpersonal communication. Human Communication Neher, W. W., & Sandin, P. (2007). Communicating ethically.
Research, 4, 164–178. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.