Page 362 - Essentials of Human Communication

References 341

Vonk, R. (2002). Self-serving interpretations of flattery: Why in- Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up
gratiation works. Journal of Personality and Social Psychol- your mind after a 100-Ms Exposure to a Face. Psychological
ogy, 82, 515–526. Science, 17, 592–598.
Wallace, K. (1955). An ethical basis of communication. Commu- Windy, D., & Constantinou, D. (2005). Assertiveness step by step.
nication Education, 4, 1–9. London: Sheldon Press.
Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory Winquist, L. A., Mohr, C. D., & Kenny, D. A. (1998). The female
and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. positivity effect in the perception of others. Journal of
Walther, J. B. (2011). Theories of computer-mediated communi- Research in Personality 32, 370–388.
cation and interpersonal relations. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Winters, J. (2009). Olfactory communication and mate choice.
Daly (Eds.), The Sage handbook of interpersonal communica- Retrieved from www.replicatedtypo.wordpress.com/2009/09
tion, 4th ed. (pp. 443–480). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. /01/olfaction
Watkins, K. (2007). How much time do you spend listening? Witcher, S. K. (1999, August 9–15). Chief executives in Asia find
Retrieved August 9, 2009, from http://articles/webraydian listening difficult. Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, p. 11.
.com/article4793-How_much_time_do_you_spend_ Won-Doornink, M. (1985). Self-disclosure and reciprocity in
listening.html conversation: A cross-national study. Social Psychology
Watzlawick, P. (1977). How real is real? Confusion, disinforma- Quarterly, 48, 97–107.
tion, communication: An anecdotal introduction to commu- Won-Doornink, M. (1991). Self-disclosure and reciprocity in
nications theory. New York: Vintage. South Korean and U.S. male dyads. In S. Ting-Toomey & F.
Watzlawick, P. (1978). The language of change: Elements of thera- Korzenny (Eds.), Cross-cultural interpersonal communica-
peutic communication. New York: Basic Books. tion (pp. 116–131). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of Wood, J. T. (1994). Gendered lives: Communication, gender, and
human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pa- culture. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
thologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton. Worthington, D. L., & Fitch-Hauser, M. E. (2012). Listening:
Weathers, M. D., Frank, E. M., & Spell, L. A. (2002). Differences in the Processes, functions, and competency. Boston: Allyn &
communication of affect: Members of the same race versus mem- Bacon.
bers of a different race. Journal of Black Psychology, 28, 66–77. Wrench, J. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (2003). A communibiological
Weinberg, H. L. (1959). Levels of knowing and existence. New examination of ethnocentrism and homophobia. Communi-
York: Harper & Row. cation Research Reports, 20, 24–33.
Wennerstrom, A., & Siegel, A. F. (2003). Keeping the floor in Wrench, J. S., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (2008). Human
multiparty conversation: Intonation, syntax, and pause. Dis- communication in everyday life: Explanations and applica-
course Processes, 36, 77–107. tions. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Wert, S. R., & Salovey, P. (2004). Introduction to the special issue Yau-fair Ho, D., Chan, S. F., Peng, S., & Ng, A. K. (2001). The dia-
on gossip. Review of General Psychology, 8, 76–77. logical self: Converging East–West constructions. Culture
Westwood, R. I., Tang, F. F., & Kirkbride, P. S. (1992). Chinese con- and Psychology, 7, 393–408.
flict behavior: Cultural antecedents and behavioral conse- Zaleski, Z., Cycon, A., & Kurc, A. (2001). Future time
quences. Organizational Development Journal, 10, 13–19. perspective and subjective well-being in adolescent
Wetzel, P. J. (1988). Are “powerless” communication strategies the samples. In P. Schmuck & K. M. Sheldon (Eds.), Life
goals and wellbeing: Towards a positive psychology of
Japanese norm? Language in Society, 17, 555–564.
human striving (pp. 58–67). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe
Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. (1977). The measurement of trust and & Huber.
its relationship to self-disclosure. Human Communication Zornoza, A., Ripoll, P., & Peiró, J. M. (2002, October).
Research, 3, 250–257. Conflict management in groups that work in two different
Whitty, M., & Gavin, J. (2001). Age/sex/location: Uncovering the communication contexts: Face-to-face and computer-
social cues in the development of online relationships. mediated communication. Small Group Research 33,
Cyber-Psychology and Behavior, 4, 623–630. 481–508.
Wigley, C. J., III. (1998). Verbal aggressiveness. In J. C. McCros- Zuckerman, M., Klorman, R., Larrance, D. T., & Spiegel, N. H.
key, J. A. Daly, M. M. Martin, & M. J. Beatty (Eds.), Commu- (1981). Facial, autonomic, and subjective components of
nication and personality: Trait perspectives (pp. 191–214). emotion: The facial feedback hypothesis versus the external-
Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. izer–internalizer distinction. Journal of Personality and So-
Wilkins, B. M., & Andersen, P. A. (1991). Gender differences and cial Psychology, 41, 929–944.
similarities in management communication: A meta- Zunin, L. M., & Zunin, N. B. (1972). Contact: The first four min-
analysis. Management Communication Quarterly, 5, 6–35. utes. Los Angeles, CA: Nash.