Page 12 - Fuck the Matrix The Removal of Any Black Man´s Confusion

So, it should be clear that sovereignty is not the ability to do as one pleases or . The laws
of the land cannot be disobeyed due to color of one’s skin, acknowledgement of a
particular race, form of dress, a flag, a peculiar hat, Christian beliefs, association with a
treaty or some foreign reason.

Perhaps, the idea of sovereignty only belonging to governments or being defined as
supreme power or authority… is the problem. Yet, Julliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421
(1884) makes it clear: “There is no such thing as a power of inherent sovereignty in the
government of the United States…In this country sovereignty resides in the people, and
Congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their Constitution entrusted to
it. All else is withheld.”

One would think that sovereignty is any man’s route to freedom. However, Dred Scott v.
Sanford places doubt on the status of Blacks in America. Roger B. Taney opposed the
idea of negroes of African descent or descendants of slaves being granted citizenship
under Articles III and IV.

Can the Black man and woman be anything other than chattel? We should question why
presidents in the last three decades have appointed individuals on the Supreme Court
that overlook Perry v. U.S., 294 U.S. 330 (1935): “In the United States, sovereignty resides
in the people…the Congress cannot invoke sovereign power of the People to override
their will as thus declared.”

For years, the patriot community reserved the idea of sovereignty for white Christians
only. Any Black person disagreeing with this fact is obviously not too sharp. Just as
“American” implies white or Caucasian, the US Constitution and/or concept of
sovereignty were not designed with the interests of freed slaves, negroes, Blacks,
Moors or “Afrikans in America”.

The attraction of money motivated change because bodies translate into money. After
all, Blacks have contracted with the government as well. This reason, linked with taxes
and societal contributions, would bring one to believe that Blacks are citizens, too.
Sadly, the pains of citizenship are used to substantiate one’s status because too few
people really acknowledge its true purpose.

Unfortunately, said methods of sovereignty will not give the Afrikan in Amerika the
freedom and liberities s/he deserves. Obviously, said emphasis should be placed on
“economic sovereignty”.