Page 34 - BJS vol. 36
P. 34

26     Bangladesh J. Sugarcane, 36 : 22-28                            June, 2015



                     Chlorophyll content (SPAD value) at different harvesting times
                            From Table 2, it was observed that, the highest chlorophyll content (SPAD value)
                     was  found  from  the  variety  V 11  (55.23)  in  120  DAS  which  was  statistically  similar  to  the
                     varieties V 3  (53.46), V 7  (51.10) and V 9  (49.10). The lowest value of chlorophyll was found
                     from the variety V 13  (34.00) although there was no significant difference was found among
                     the  varieties  in  180  DAS.  In  general,  the  chlorophyll  content  was  found  better  at  early
                     harvesting stage (120 DAS) and it tends to decrease at later maturing stage of sugarbeet.
                     In sugarbeet, the economic product (sucrose) was a vegetative component of the growth
                     phases.  The  supply  of  photosynthate  to  the  root  is  linearly  related  to  sucrose  yield.  In
                     theory,  the  longer  the  green  leaves  remained  photosynthetically  active  the  more
                     photosynthate was supplied to the root, which should then relate to higher sucrose yields
                     (Doney,1990).  In  current  experiment,  sugarbeet  genotypes  also  exhibited  significant
                     effect  on  chlorophyll  content.  In  general,  chlorophyll  content  was  found  higher  at  early
                     harvesting stage (120 DAS) and it tends to decrease at later maturing stage of sugarbeet,
                     this might be due to a greater number of leaves become senescence at later harvesting
                     stage.

                     Table 2.  Leaf area index and chlorophyll concentration at different harvesting times

                                        Leaf Area Index                  Chlorophyll (SPAD value)
                      Genotypes
                               120 DAS  140 DAS  160 DAS  180  DAS  120 DAS   140 DAS   160 DAS   180 DAS
                         V 1     1.59     1.30    1.50    0.47    46.7     41.10    39.90    38.50
                         V 2     1.25     0.87    2.09    0.51    47.06    37.98    40.13    35.66
                         V 3     0.99     0.77    1.72    0.47    53.46    40.75    41.46    37.83
                         V 4     1.32     0.86    1.36    0.41    52.66    42.26    40.56    35.16
                         V 5     1.07     1.01    0.84    0.44    44.06    38.51    42.83    36.20
                         V 6     0.86     1.01    1.04    0.61    39.36    36.23    38.13    34.83
                         V 7     1.10     1.04    1.36    0.59    51.10    46.63    42.36    40.43
                         V 8     0.99     1.03    1.58    0.49    46.53    37.33    44.33    34.30
                         V 9     1.20     0.85    1.17    0.55    49.10    42.25    42.86    35.96
                         V 10    1.37     1.23    3.05    0.71    46.63    42.68    44.53    36.96
                         V 11    1.15     1.22    2.37    0.89    55.23    45.28    44.16    37.73
                         V 12    1.48     1.11    1.69    0.73    47.73    42.53    42.60    34.43
                         V 13    1.09     1.20    1.95    0.61    40.13    38.21    44.23    34.00
                         V 14    1.32     1.23    1.74    0.80    44.30    40.27    43.26    36.00
                         V 15    1.03     1.20    2.08    0.59    43.56    38.05    43.60    39.86
                         V 16    1.05     1.18    1.96    0.64    46.56    42.68    44.73    38.96
                         V 17    1.13     1.36    2.11    0.58    40.66    39.36    43.73    37.13
                       LSD (0.05)             0.66                              6.53
                       CV (%)                35.58                              9.71

                     Brix and pol% at different harvesting times
                            From Table 3, it was observed that, the highest brix per cent of sugarbeet was
                     found  from  the  variety  V 16 (23.03%)  in  160  DAS  which  was  statistically  similar  to  the
                     varieties  V 12 (22.16%),  V 11 (22.03%),  V 17 (21.80%)  and  V 10 (21.70%)  at  5%  level  of
                     significance. On the other hand, the lowest brix% was found from the variety V 13 (11.10%)
                     in 120 DAS, but there was no significant difference was found among the varieties in 120
                     DAS.
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39