Page 27 - F6 - Capital Allowances - Leases
P. 27
Solution (cont.)
Since the annual rental, R10 000, is less than 10% of the fair
market value as determined above, that is, R20 480, it is in
terms of s 8(5)(bB)(iii) deemed to be nominal and Mr Koontz
is under s 8(5)(bA) deemed to have acquired the equipment
for no consideration for the purposes of s 8(5)(b). He must
therefore include in his income in terms of s 8(5)(b) read
with s 8(5)(a) the the fair market value as determined limited
to rentals previously deducted = R204 800
Therefore R204 800 must be included in Mr Koontz’s
income. If the rental payable after the termination of the
initial lease had exceeded the nominal amount of R20 480 a
year, then there would have been no deemed recoupment
under s 8(5).