Page 266 - Microsoft Word - 00 CIMA F1 Prelims STUDENT 2018.docx
P. 266

Chapter 10




               6.5  Application to business valuation

                             There are two ways in which the gearing/degearing formulae above can
                             be used to derive a cost of equity and/or a WACC that can be used in
                             business valuation.


                             Both methods start from the assumption that you have been given an
                             equity beta for a proxy company.


                 Method 1                                      Method 2

                      Use the formula to derive the                Use the formula to derive the

                       proxy entity's ungeared beta                  proxy entity's ungeared beta
                       factor.                                       factor.

                      Assume that this beta factor also            Use CAPM to find an ‘ungeared

                       reflects the business risk of the             cost of equity’ (k eu) for the proxy
                       entity being valued, so regear                entity.

                       this ungeared beta to reflect the
                       capital structure of the entity              On the assumption that this k eu
                       being valued.                                 is also a measure of the
                                                                     ungeared cost of equity of the
                      Then use CAPM to derive a cost                entity being valued (same
                       of equity for the entity being                business risk), use M & M's
                       valued.                                       WACC formula to calculate the
                                                                     WACC of the entity being
                      (If necessary) Use this k e in the            valued.
                       standard WACC formula to find
                       the entity's WACC.


               (Note: Method 2 can only be used to calculate WACC, whereas Method 1 derives
               both cost of equity and WACC.) Both methods will now be illustrated, to show that
               they give the same answer for WACC.























               258
   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271