Page 70 - textbook5chapters
P. 70

1524 GCIG Rare Tumor Consensus Review & Guidelines

based on current evidence for advanced and metastatic          patient’s preferences for the treatment schedule, drug side
disease. At present, the same chemotherapy regimen             effects, venous access, co-morbidities, disease burden,
might be recommended for both AC and SCC: paclitaxel           disease pace, and organ function. Reasonable regimens
plus cisplatin plus bevacizumab as standard treatment          to consider for first-line therapy include gemcitabine plus
and paclitaxel and carboplatin as alternative treatment        docetaxel, doxorubicin, doxorubicin plus ifosfamide, and
for patient not able to receive bevacizumab (JCOG0505).        gemcitabine. Other treatment options, used as second-
Prospective clinical trials are needed to help develop         line therapy or after, include trabectedin, ifosfamide,
treatment guidelines and explore the role of neo adjuvant      pazopanib, dacarbazine or temozolomide, and eribulin.
chemotherapy or exact sensisitivity to radiation therapy       For patients with indolent disease and low tumor burden
for such histological subgroup.                                whose tumors express ER or PR aromatase inhibition
                                                               may be considered. For patients with single-site or
Cervix Small Cell Carcinoma                                    oligometastatic disease and a long disease-free interval
(Satoh et al., 2014)                                           metastatectomy may be considered.

Small cell carcinoma of the cervix (SCCC) is a rare            Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma
histological entity of uterine cervical cancer. Compared       (Amant et al., 2014)
with other common histological types, squamous cell
carcinoma or adenocarcinoma, the outcome of SCCC               Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) accounts for
is poor because of the high incidence of nodal and/            approximately 20% of all uterine sarcomas and presents,
or distant metastasis even with early stage. There are         at a mean age, around 50 years of age. Half of the patients
insufficient data to provide clear guidance on the optimal     are premenopausal. ESS often manifests as an endometrial
management strategy, though multimodal therapy with            polyp and 60% of cases present with FIGO stage I disease.
surgery, chemotherapy (such as cisplatin and etoposide)        The natural history is one of slow growing indolent
and radiation therapy is often recommended.                    disease. Typical microscopic findings include a uniform
                                                               population of endometrial stromal-type cells invading the
Uterine Leiomyosarcoma                                         myometrium and myometrial vessels. Imaging studies
(Hensley et al., 2014)                                         cannot reliably diagnose ESS preoperatively, so surgical
                                                               resection for a presumed fibroid is a common scenario.
Uterine sarcomas represent about 8% of uterine cancers,        Hysterectomy is the cornerstone of treatment for localized
with an incidence of about 0.4 per 100,000 women.              ESS, but morcellation should be avoided. Systematic
Leiomyosarcomas are the most common subtype; most              lymphadenectomy in ESS does not improve the outcome.
are high grade malignancies with a high risk for recurrence    Leaving the ovaries in situ does not worsen survival and
and progression. Overall survival is dependent on stage        this is of importance especially for young women. The
with 5-year survival estimates of stage I: 76%, stage II:      data support the current practice to administer adjuvant
60%, stage III: 45%, and stage IV: disease 29% . Uterine       hormonal treatment, although several questions remain,
leiomyosarcomas are staged using the FIGO 2009 uterine         such as optimal doses, regimens (progestins or aromatase
sarcoma staging system. Other factors that have been           inhibitors) and duration of therapy. Repeat surgery for
evaluated for their potential prognostic impact include        recurrent disease that is indolent and hormone sensitive
tumor morcellation , mitotic index and tumor grade.            appears to be an acceptable approach. Systemic treatment
For patients whose disease appears limited to the uterus,      for recurrent disease is mainly hormonal.
hysterectomy of the intact uterus, without morcellation,
is recommended. Although it is recognized that the             High-Grade Undifferentiated Sarcomas
risk for recurrence after resection of uterus-limited          (Pautier et al., 2014)
high grade LMS exceeds 50%, no adjuvant intervention
has been shown to improve progression-free or overall          High-grade undifferentiated sarcomas (HGUSs) are
survival outcomes. Standard management after complete          rare uterine malignancies arising from the endometrial
resection of uterus-limited disease is observation. For        stroma. They are poorly differentiated sarcomas
patients with locally advanced, completely resected            composed of cells that do not resemble proliferative-
uterine LMS, there are no prospective data upon which          phase endometrial stroma. High-grade undifferentiated
to base management recommendations. Choices may                sarcomas are characterized by aggressive behavior and
include observation, adjuvant radiation, adjuvant              poor prognosis. They can have complex karyotypic
hormone blockade, or adjuvant chemotherapy. For                modifications but lack a unifying tumor-specific
metastatic uterine LMS, systemic treatment is the              alteration with no cyclin D1 nor ER and PR expression
standard of care. There is no established superior first line  with a very bad prognosis (undifferenciated sarcomas) or
chemotherapy regimen. Treatment recommendations for            be associated with an YWHAE-FAM22 rearrangement
an individual patient should take into consideration the       and cyclin D1 expression (sometimes ER/PR positivity)
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74