Page 418 - SSB Interview: The Complete Guide, Second Edition
P. 418

not be introduced.

                 The concept of untouchability was not practised uniformly throughout the
               country; therefore the identification of oppressed classes was difficult to carry

               out. Allegedly, the practice of segregation and untouchability prevailed more
               in  the  southern  parts  of  India  as  opposed  to  northern  India.  Furthermore,
               certain castes/communities, considered ‘untouchable’ in one province, were
               not  so  in  other  provinces.  The  continuous  efforts  of  some  of  the  social

               reformers  of  the  country  like  Rettamalai  Srinivasa  Paraiyar,  Ayothidas
               Pandithar, Jyotiba Phule, Babasaheb Ambedkar, Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj

               and others, worked to eradicate ‘casteism’.

                 According  to  the  2001  census,  the  SCs  represented  16.20%  of  the
               population  and  the  STs  were  8.10%.  Some  of  the  arguments/counter-

               arguments put forth by anti-reservationists and pro-reservationists are:




                Anti-Reservationists                                   Pro-Reservationists

                                                                       ‘Men should remain in the
                Lower castes no longer accept that their
                                                                       same occupation and station
                lower economic status, lower position in the
                                                                       of their life as their
                social hierarchy and lack of respect from
                                                                       forefathers’ was a part of
                members of higher castes are a “given” in
                                                                       religious precepts and social
                their social existence.
                                                                       customs long ago, in India.

                Opponents are unhappy because they

                believe that an arbitrary socio-economic               The OBCs, on the other
                injustice is being committed against them              hand, argue that they should

                and in favour of those who have already                get a greater share in
                reached (or even gone beyond) a ‘level’                administrative positions

                playing field, and equality of opportunity is because political power
                being eroded from the point such ‘level’               resides in India’s
                ground was reached by individual members administrative positions.

                of a community that is only collectively               They view political power as
                labelled as ‘underprivileged’. They are                a way to get economic
   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423