Page 5 - CSEB Report
P. 5

Study on Compressed Stabilized Earth Blocks



                 2. Literature Review


              The evolution of fried clay bricks with mass production in the kiln lead to growing concern
              of  awareness  regarding  sustainable  building  materials  and  environmental  issue,  which
              gave rise to compressed stabilized earth block (CSEB) as an option in the view of energy

              efficient, cost reduction and environmental friendly building materials, overall contribution

              on  the  sustainable  development[11].  Internationally,  the  CSEB  bricks  were  scientifically
              proven  to  have  many  advantages  amongst  which  some  of  the  prominent  qualities
              according  to  [1]  were  energy  efficiency  and  eco-friendliness,  bio-degradable,  cost

              efficiency,  transferable  technology,  market  opportunity,  reducing  imports,  and  social

              acceptance.

              Soil  stabilization  alter  the  soil  properties  by  chemical  or  physical  means  in  order  to

              enhance the engineering quality of the soil[6]. There are two commonly used soil stabilizers
              -cement  and    lime  but  some  people  also  uses  Fly  ash  as  stabilizer.  One  of  the  main

              functions of the stabilizing medium is to reduce the swelling properties of the soil through
              forming a rigid framework with the soil mass, enhancing its strength and durability[10]. In

              cement stabilization [10] stated that the content of the cement binder in the mix ranges
              between 4%  to 10% of the soil dry weight. However, [12] pointed that if the content of

              the  cement  binder  is  greater  than  10%  it  becomes  uneconomical  for  the  production  of
              CSEB.


              CSEB  represents  a  considerable  improvement  over  traditional  earth  building  techniques.

              When guaranteed by quality control, CSEB products can very easily bear comparison with
              other materials such as the fired brick. A striking contrast between CSEB and conventional
              bricks is the energy consumed during the production process and carbon emission. CSEB

              creates 22 kg CO2 /tonne compare to that of concrete blocks (143 kg CO2 /tonne), and

              common fired clay bricks (200 kg CO2 /tonne) during production [10].

              The research conducted by [10] emphasizes on the advantages of using CSEB for better

              living as it promotes healthier building material and cost reducing not only in production
              but also in service cost. The [8] also found out that CSEBs are eco-friendly as these blocks

              are un-burnt products, during production no coal or burning material is needed, so it does
              not produce any harmful gases during production. In terms of thermal properties CSEB is

              the  appropriate  material  to  replace  or  as  another  alternative  material  used  in  homes
              because  it  has  a  low  thermal  conductivity  compared  with  common  clay  brick  which  is

              0.771W/m°C[9].






         4                     Engineering Adaptation and Risk Reduction Division (EARRD), DES, MOWHS
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10