Page 70 - The Circle of Life
P. 70

This is only logical for it was given without reserve and would defeat its purpose

               if it reverts back to the giver at some stage. Just does not make sense.

               Morning gifts & Morganatic Marriages


               This is a culture thing and not the law here and thus more interesting. In some

               European  countries  it  is  the  accepted  way  to  give  gifts  on  the  first  morning  to
               each  other  but  it  is  just  a  tradition  and  not  enforceable  by  law.  In  fact  as  we
               saw,  Roman  law  prohibited  the  man  from  buying  his  wife's affections. There is

               no  such  thing  in  South  African  and  most  African  jurisdictions  as  we  don't  have

               royalty around and the ones who claim to be are not taken seriously.

               In addition even if they are around we don't give a  (you know what) if you saw

               Gone  with  the  Wind  about  their  titles. It is simply unimportant in a democratic
               Republic  though  our  traditional  leaders  are  treated  with  a  lot  of  respect.

               However, they are not royalty as in the European sense of the word. They never
               make the tabloids for a sincere lack of interest in them.


               In Germanic law the "morning gift" came into being which the wife may or may

               not  be  able  to  dispose  of  as  she  pleases  depending  on  the  exact  arrangement
               between  her  and  the  giver.  She  might  lose  it  if  she  re-marries  which  is

               something we find in pension pay-outs too and is inherently wrong. What does it
               matter if she marries again or not I ask? The pension should be paid regardless.

               I am sure someone clever will sort this out in equality courts one day. A pension
               is earned. Is not a gift!


               A  female  colleague  of  mine  said  the  morning  gift  smacks  of prostitution to her
               since  the  gift  is  made  after  the  first  night  together  but  historically  this  was  to

               take care of the children. You must keep in mind that though the children were
               considered legitimate but they could not inherit their fathers' titles and property.

               This is unfair and no doubt they were treated unjustly (differently) from the rest.
               Hence today this type of marriage or rather the consequences as set out above

               is not legally enforced which is good. These days the  children will be treated as

               any other kids on the laws of succession.

               The  point  is  that  the morning gift came into being to provide for them and the

               wife.  The  law  is  always  neutral  (well  it  should  be)  and  try  to  be  fair  to  all

                                                                                                        69
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75