Page 17 - Special Issue Forensic PDF Updated
P. 17
1st International Forensic Science E-Conference
penhaver, 2007); but in instruments (stereo micro- and practice (p. 7 to 26).
this case, it was observed scope and VSC), it was Totowa, New Jersey: Humana
that all the four signatures observed that there were Press Inc.
were exactly alike and definite signs of forgery 2. Leaver, W. L. (2006). Intro-
had no natural variations in the questioned signa- duction to Forensic Document
Examination. In C. N.
among them which tures such as indentations, Ashraf Mozyani, The Forensic
suggests that the ques- traced guidelines, exact Laboratory Handbook (pp.
tioned signatures were overlapping of signatures, 223 - 234). Totowas, New
traced from a single genu- absence of natural varia- Jersey: Humana Press Inc.
ine signature. tions etc; and the type of 3. Lindblom, J. S. (2006). Sci-
forgery used in this case entific Examination of Ques-
CONCLUSIONS was indented forgery. tioned Documents. In J. S.
Lindblom, Scientific Exami-
nation of Questioned Docu-
In this study, the ques- Further, it is expected that ments (pp. 75 - 107). Boca
tioned signatures were this case study will pro- Raton: CRC Press.
observed under various vide useful information to 4. Osborn, A. S. (1910). Ques-
instruments to detect any the document examin- tioned Documents. In A. S.
signs of forgery and inter- ers that they should not Osborn, Questioned
Documents (pp. 266-270).
se comparison was done conclude his/her opinion New york: ROCHESTER.
to find out the type of based only on physical 5. Roy A. Huber, A. M.
forgery used to examination of handwrit- (1999). Handwriting Identifi-
execute the disputed sig- ing/signatures, it is ad- cation : Facts and Fundamen-
natures. From the above vised to use all the sophis- tals. In
observations, it was con- ticated instruments to A. M. Roy A. Huber, Hand-
cluded that when the give probable opinions. writing Identification : Facts
questioned and standard and Fundamentals (pp. 27-
47). New York: CRC press.
signatures were physically References 6. Tarannum, A. (2018).
examined, there were no Traced Forgery – A Case
signs of forgery 1. Koppenhaver, K. M. Study. International Associa-
(2007). Principles of Hand-
observed between ques- writing. In K. M. Koppen- tion of
tioned and standard signa- haver, Scientists and Researchers ,
tures but when observed FORENSICDOCUMENT 01 (01), 1-4
under sophisticated EXAMINATION, principles
17
