Page 183 - How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper, 8th Edition 8th Edition
P. 183

Page 200

     Seriously, we should all come to understand that sexism in language can have "savage" results. Scientific writing that
     promotes stereotypes is not scientific. Good guides have been published to show us how to avoid use of sexist
     language (American Psychological Association, 1994; Maggio, 1997).

     Let me end where I started by again emphasizing the importance of syntax. Whenever comprehension goes out the
     window, faulty syntax is






                                                                                                                 Page 214

     usually responsible. Sometimes, faulty syntax is simply funny and comprehension is not lost, as in these two items,
     culled from want ads: "For sale, fine German Shepherd dog, obedient, well trained, will eat anything, very fond of
     children." "For sale, fine grand piano, by a lady, with three legs."

     But look at this sentence, which is similar to thousands that have appeared in the scientific literature: "Thymic
     humoral factor (THF) is a single heat-stable polypeptide isolated from calf thymus composed of 31 amino acids with
     molecular weight of 3,200." The double prepositional phrase "with molecular weight of 3,200" would logically modify
     the preceding noun "acids," meaning that the amino acids had a molecular weight of 3,200. Less logically, perhaps the
     calf thymus had a molecular weight of 3,200. Least logical of all (because of their distance apart in the sentence)
     would be for the THF to have a molecular weight of 3,200—but, indeed, that was what the author was trying to tell
     us.

     If you have any interest whatsoever in learning to use English more effectively, you should read Strunk and White's
     (1979) The Elements of Style. The "elements" are given briefly (in 85 pages!) and clearly. Anyone writing anything
     should read and use this famous little book. After you have mastered Strunk and White, proceed immediately to
     Fowler (1965). Do not pass go; do not collect $200. Of course, if you really do want to get a Monopoly on good
     scientific English, buy three copies (one for the office, one for the lab, one for home) of that superbly quintessential
     book, Scientific English (Day, 1995).











































  file:///C|/...0208%20Books%20(part%201%20of%203)/How%20to%20write%20&%20publish%20scientific%20paper/32.htm[4/27/2009 1:30:01 PM]
   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188