Page 135 - Winterling's Chasing the Wind
P. 135

In the late 70’s, I flew to WGN Chicago to meet with John Coleman and Joe D’Leo
                   who  were  planning  a  national  weather  channel.  I,  along  with  a  few  other
                   meteorologists,  met  after  the  station  signed  off  around  midnight  to  make  a
                   demonstration tape of this significant venture. Around 1980, John informed me that
                   Landmark Corporation had decided to finance the channel. My wife, Virginia, and I
                   flew  to  their  new  facility  in  Atlanta  and  witnessed  how  this  was  a  monumental
                   achievement.

                   In discussing the operation of the Weather Channel, I told John that I thought that it
                   needed more than just maps, radar and satellite images. I suggested using a lot of video
                   of actual weather would relate more to viewers who were not meteorologically savvy.
                   Surprisingly, he saw no need for that.

                   While Channel 12 had always operated a weather radar for many years, we were more
                   comfortable with using the National Weather Service radars. They had one to the north
                   of Waycross, Georgia and one to the south in Daytona Beach. With these radars, we
                   had no problem with ground clutter that obscured data near the radar site. We also had
                   no equipment to maintain and update. We paid for a dedicated telephone connection to
                   both sites, stored the images on tape via a Scott time-lapse box and were able to show
                   the movement of the weather systems. We also had a dial-up fax system that we used to
                   select images from other parts of the U.S.

                   Over  the  years,  we  discovered  there  was  sometimes  a  difference  between  actual
                   weather  and  the  virtual  (not  real)  weather  as  displayed  by  computer;  in  fact,  its
                   portrayal can actually be false. Around 2002, we tried My-Cast. It was so bad because
                   it was showing our skies as overcast or  raining when our skies were actually blue
                   because the seabreeze had pushed our clouds and rain well to the west of the city. It
                   used  the  MM5  forecast  model.  We  learned  that  the  WSI  (Weather  Services
                   International) GFS and NAM weather simulations usually didn’t show our hyper-local
                   weather. The rain display had been completely misleading when it comes to showing
                   rainfall totals. A classic example was on August 23, 2005, when it showed less than an
                   inch of rain in the Mandarin section of Jacksonville when over 2 inches had fallen.

                   Before the computer, I could easily write and draw on the weather maps with a Magic
                   Marker, but after 1981 my attempts to use the computer’s telestrator were fruitless. The
                   drawing either did not follow my motions, or the lines were too thin or faint to be of
                                                                                                  127
   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140