Page 22 - Sharp-Hundley 2012
P. 22

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
        “Respondents in Discovery” Article Available…

            An article by Sharp Thinking editor John Hundley exploring the intricacies of Illinois’ Respondents in Discovery Statute
        (735 ILCS 5/2-402) has been published by the SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY LAW JOURNAL.

            Respondents in Discovery: A Beneficent Statute With Traps for the Unwary, 36 S.I.U.L.J. 335 (2012), provides both a
        thorough history of the legislative development of the statute and a comprehensive survey of case decisions in a variety of
        areas, including: the nature of the statute, the procedures for invoking it, statute of limitations issues, issues that arise in
        attempting  to  extend  its  six-month  deadline  for  converting  respondents  to  defendants,  issues  that  arise  in  actually
        attempting to convert respondents into defendants, issues that arise when attempting to discard use of the statute after it
        has been invoked, the applicability of the statute in federal cases, and matters of appellate review.

            If you would like a copy of the article, email Brenda@lotsharp.com.
        ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

            ► failing to disclose the name under which the collector is engaging in debt collection and which he or
        she is legally authorized to use;

            ►  using  a  form  of  communication  which  simulates  legal  or  judicial  process  or  which  gives  the
        appearance of being authorized, issued or approved by a government agency or attorney when it is not;

            ► unauthorized use of a badge, uniform, or other indicia of a government agency;

            ► conducting business under a name or in a manner which falsely suggests that a collector is bonded
        or is affiliated with any government agency or court if such collector is not;

            ► failing to disclose, when demanding payment, the name of the person to whom the claim is owed
        and,  at  the  request  of  the  debtor,  the  address  where  payment  is  to  be  made  and  the  address  of  the
        person to whom the claim is owed;

            ► misrepresenting the amount of the debt; representing that a debt may be increased by attorney or
        other fees or charges when such fees or charges may not legally be added;

            ► representing that the collector is an attorney or an agent for an attorney if he is not;

            ► attempting to collect interest or other charge or fee in excess of the actual debt unless authorized;

            ► communicating with a debtor when the collector is informed in writing that an attorney represents
        the debtor, unless the attorney authorizes the communication or is unresponsive;

            ►  engaging  in  dishonorable,  unethical  or  unprofessional  conduct  of  a  character  likely  to  deceive,
        defraud or harm the public; and

            ► merely threatening many of the foregoing.

            Identity Theft Provisions.  The act contains significant provisions limiting collectors’ activities in
        cases  of  identity  theft.    §  9.4.    Upon  receipt  of  specified  documentation  (which  is  fairly  detailed),  the
        collector  must  make  a  good-faith  determination  whether  the  specific  debt  in  question  is  the  result  of
        identity theft.  If the collector determines that all the information available to it establishes that the specific
        debt is not the result of identity theft, the collector may recommence collection activity.  If it decides not to
        recommence activity, but has previously provided adverse information to a credit reporting agency, it is
        obligated to correct that information.

        John\SharpThinking\#66.doc

        ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
                                           THE  SHARP  LAW  FIRM,  P.C.

                    1115 Harrison, P.O. Box 906, Mt. Vernon, IL 62864 • Telephone 618-242-0246 • Facsimile 618-242-1170

           Business Transactions • Litigation • Financial Law • Problem Finances • Real Estate • Corporate • Commercial Disputes • Creditors’ Rights •
                                        Arbitration • Employment Matters • Estate Planning • Probate

            Terry Sharp: Tsharp@lotsharp.com; John T. Hundley: Jhundley@lotsharp.com; Bentley J. Bender: Bbender@lotsharp.com.

                                                        Advertising Material
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27