Page 45 - Sharp-Hundley 2012
P. 45

Family Law Roundup





                Sharp                                         Thinking







        No. 78                 Perspectives on Developments in the Law from The Sharp Law Firm, P.C.                  December  2012

                 Assembly Increases Sanctions for Visitation Violations


             The General Assembly has increased the sanctions for custodial parents who violate visitation orders.

             Effective August 21, 2012, the legislature added to 625 ILCS 5/7-701 (a statute previously reserved
        for parents who failed to pay child support) language making the violation of a visitation order grounds for
        driver’s  license  suspension.    In  P.A.  97-1047,  it  also  toughened  other  enforcement  mechanisms  for
        visitation abuse as set forth in 750 ILCS 5/607.1.

             Under the prior version of § 7-701, a parent who was 90 days or more delinquent in child support
        payments  could  have  his  or  her  driver’s  license  suspended.    The  new  act  adds  visitation  abuse  as  a
        violation  that  may  result  in  license  suspension.    Driving  privileges  can  be  suspended  until  a  court
        determines that the non-compliant parent has attained “sufficient compliance” to warrant a reinstatement
        of driving privileges.

             Previous sanctions for violating a visitation order included: modification of custody; counseling; make
        up time; supervised visits or “other appropriate relief deemed equitable.”  While the last provision, “other
        appropriate relief” gave judges the liberty to impose serious sanctions, the new act clearly enumerates
        additional  sanctions  that  the  legislature  has  deemed  appropriate.    In  addition  to  driver’s  license
        suspension,  the  newly  enumerated  sanctions  include  placing  the  non-compliant  parent  on  probation;
        imprisoning him or her for up to 6 months, and fining him or her up to $500.  750 ILCS 5/607.1(5)(c-1).

                       Guardian May Seek to Dissolve Ward’s Marriage

             A guardian has the authority to seek permission to file a dissolution of marriage petition on behalf of
        her ward, the Illinois Supreme Court recently held.

             Ruling in Karbin v. Karbin, 2012 IL 112815, the court said, “we believe a guardian has the authority to
        seek permission from the court to file a dissolution petition on behalf of the ward if such petition is found to
        be in the ward’s best interest.”  In determining what is in the ward’s best interest the court held that such a
        petitioner must satisfy a clear and convincing burden of proof.  The heightened burden was set because
        dissolution  cases  present  issues  involving  personal  interests  more  complex  and  important  than  those
        typically present in civil law suits, the court said.

             In  Karbin,  the  guardian,  who  also  was  the  daughter  of  the  ward,  filed  a  response  to  a  dissolution
        petition filed by the husband, her adoptive father.  Thereafter, the husband withdrew his petition.  As a
        result, the ward was treated as the petitioner for divorce purposes.  The husband in turn sought to have
        the guardian’s petition dismissed based on lack of standing.  The circuit and appellate courts held that the
        guardian did not have standing and dismissed the action.  The Supreme Court reversed and remanded.

             Its decision overturned the previous Supreme Court decision of In re Marriage of Drews, 115 Ill.2d
        201 (1986), which held that a guardian could not file for dissolution on behalf of a ward.  In Drews the
        court interpreted §§ 11a-17 and 11a-18 of Probate Act (755 ILCS 5/11a-17, 11a-18) narrowly, concluding
        a guardian  has only the powers explicitly set forth in the act.  Section 11a-17 states that a guardian’s


        ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
        Sharp  Thinking  is  an  occasional  newsletter  of  The  Sharp  Law  Firm,  P.C.  addressing  developments  in  the  law  which  may  be  of  interest.    Nothing  contained  in  Sharp
        Thinking  shall  be  construed  to  create  an  attorney-client  relation  where  none  previously  has  existed,  nor  with  respect  to  any  particular  matter.   The  perspectives  herein
        constitute educational material on general legal topics and are not legal advice applicable to any particular situation.  To establish an attorney-client relation or to obtain legal
        advice on your particular situation, contact a Sharp lawyer at the phone number or one of the addresses provided on page 2 of this newsletter.
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50