Page 22 - CodeWatcher Summer 2017
P. 22

Is the Bedrock






           of the ICC Safe






           from Erosion?








            Powerful special interests alarmed by building energy


            code gains are working hard to reduce the essential role

            of building officials in the code development process.


            BY BILL FAY                                           NAHB’s latest assault on energy codes is a toolkit of weak-
                                                                ening amendments, “How to Modify the Codes in Your State.”
                   N 2010, AFTER THE DUST SETTLED on the fi nal   As odd as it seems that one of ICC’s “Strategic Partners”
                   2012 IECC, which boosted the energy effi  ciency of   would be among the sharpest critics and most effective
                   new homes by 38%, powerful opponents went to   opponents of I-Codes, the ICC Board’s response to NAHB’s
                   work to attack and challenge the new code and, more   criticisms of the 2012 IECC was even odder: It split the
                   signifi cantly, change the ICC’s Code Development   15-person IECC Code Development Committee into two
                   Committee structure to prevent future residential   12-person committees–one  residential and the  other
           Iimprovements in the effi  ciency of the International   commercial–and gave NAHB virtual control over the former
            Energy Conservation Code (IECC).                    by assigning them four of the 11 voting seats, instead of the
              It’s ironic that those “powerful effi  ciency opponents”   one seat they had previously.
            include three of the ICC’s fi ve “Strategic Partners”–the   The result of giving one organization so much power over
            Building Owners & Managers Association (BOMA), the   a code that ultimately regulates them is strikingly clear:
            National Multifamily Housing Council (NMHC), and the   After historic effi  ciency improvements in the 2009 and 2012
            National Association of Homebuilders (NAHB). All three   IECC raised the profi le of the IECC at national and state
            can be counted on to oppose nearly all proposals that   levels, the 2015 and 2018 IECC have yielded very minor
            boost building effi  ciency, both during IECC development   effi  ciency improvements.
            and before state legislatures and other bodies considering   In addition, during the CDP for 2018 IECC, the Residential
            IECC adoption.                                      Energy Committee favorably recommended a large number

            22   CodeWatcher / Summer 2017                                                          www.codewatcher.us
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27