Page 271 - J. C. Turner "History and Science of Knots"
P. 271

262                     History and Science of Knots

              A few decades later, Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855), one of the greatest
          mathematicians and physicists of all time, made sketches of knots*and began to
          think of their properties. It is clear from notes found in his papers after he died
          that during his working life he gave much thought to the problem of capturing
          the essence of knots in mathematical terms. However, to our knowledge he
          published only one paper which referred to knots; this paper dealt with a
          problem in the theory of electrodynamics, and it involved the linking number
          of two wires winding together in space. In 1847 his student (and later colleague,
          at Gottingen University) Johann Benedict Listing (1806-1902) published the
          first book on Topology [11]. The book was devoted primarily to knot theory;
          and we may surmise that Listing was influenced by Gauss when developing
          his ideas on this virgin subject.
              The story of how topological knot theories have developed since 1847 is
          told in the previous chapter of this book. It is a tale which deals almost
          exclusively with the hunt for topological invariants of knots; that is, with
          the search for mathematically derived numbers or expressions, obtained from
          studies of diagrams of knots, which enable one knot to be distinguished from
          another with mathematical certainty. Knots are truly mysterious objects; it is
          hard to say unambiguously what they are, and even harder to describe their
          properties. Before seeking a topological invariant for them, one first has to
          find a way of defining a knot, in mathematical language. Then one has to
          state very carefully what one means by saying `That knot is the same as this
          knot.' Indeed, it turns out that there are many different, useful ways to define
          `sameness', each being with reference to a different set of properties of a knot.
          In short, one has to define equivalence relations for knots. Then, and only
          then, can one attempt to classify knots, and to study their properties, using
          mathematical models and/or experimental methods.
              The kind of knot theory we have spoken about so far is `classical' or `topo-
          logical' knot theory. Since the publication [7] of the Jones polynomial invariant
          in 1986, with its applications in genetics and quantum physics, development
          of this theory has become a burgeoning industry in Mathematical Science. We
          submit, however, that it is only one part of the Science of Knots.
              There is a great deal to learn about knots which does not hinge upon
          purely topological notions. Indeed, we assert that the current topological knot
          theory says nothing at all of interest or use to "the craftsman who fashions a
          braid, a net or some knots" (see the above Vandermonde quotation).
              The craft of braiding is perhaps as old as Humankind. It is highly likely
          that Eve discovered how to braid her own tresses in the Garden of Eden. More-
          over, it is still, today, a highly useful and decorative craft practised extensively
          in virtually every society. Is it not strange, then, that until recently no useful

          *A page from his notebooks, bearing the date 1794, is shown in the Preface to this book.
   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276