Page 84 - IBC Orders us 7-CA Mukesh Mohan
P. 84

Order Passed by Sec 7
               Hon’ble NCLT Principal Bench



               17.     A  further  reference  has  been  made  to  the  Master  Circular  dated  01.07.2015  which  deals  with
               classification of asset as NPA if interest and/or instalment of principal remained overdue for a period of

               more than 90 days in respect of a term loan than it has to be treated as NPA. Thus, the total NPA of the
               Corporate Debtor was much less than 60% as on 31.03.2016. Accordingly, it has been claimed that no
               Insolvency and Bankruptcy process could have been initiated.


               18.     Respondent has further submitted that the Financial Creditor was required to give the Corporate
               Debtor a period of six months to work out a resolution plan as per the press release issued by the Reserve

               Bank of India vide circular dated 05.05.2017 titled as "Timelines for Stressed Assets Resolution". It was
               clarified that the lenders must adhere to timeliness for implementation of Corrective Action Plan (CAP)

               (including  S4A  i.e.  Scheme  for  Sustainable  Structuring  of  Stressed  Assets  dated  13.06.2016).  The
               decision agreed upon by a minimum of 60% of creditors by value and 50% of creditors by number in the
               Joint Lenders Forum would be considered as the basis for deciding Corrective Action Plan (CAP), and

               will be binding on all lenders. The petition has extracted the circular issued in May 2017 (CD3). It is
               claimed that Joint Lender Forum led by the applicant itself was actively considering restructuring of the
               debt of the borrower under Scheme of sustainable structuring of stressed assets (S4A) and the Financial

               Creditor was obliged to implement the same vis-a-vis the Corporate Debtor.

               19.     It has then we asserted that the application lacks in material particulars and the amounts claimed

               are not substantiated. A reference has been made highlighting the discrepancies in material particulars
               which are as under:-


               (a) The Application lacks material particulars and the amounts claimed are unsubstantiated

               (i)  The  Applicant  in  Part  IV,  Sr.  No.  2  of  the  Application/Form  1  has  claimed  an  amount  of  Rs.

               4390,75,41,611 for the Indian Rupee Loans and US$ 49,684,877 towards foreign currency loans, are in
               default details whereof have been sought to be provided in Annexure 7 to the Application. While the
               Application/Form 1 does not mention the period of alleged default, Annexure-7 states "Details of default

               as on 30 June 2017". Mandatory evidence to corroborate the claims made in Annexure 7 is however not
               provided by the Applicant.


               (ii) Part V, Sr. Nos. 6 and 7 of the Application, refer to record of default (Annexure 11) and detailed
               account  statements  (Annexure  12).  Annexure-11  provides  "Report  on  Exposure  to  a  Borrower"  with

               31.03.2017 as the quarter in reference. The account statements provided in Annexure-12, on the other




               84
   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89