Page 85 - IBC Orders us 7-CA Mukesh Mohan
P. 85

Order Passed Under Sec 7
                                                                              Hon’ble NCLT Principal Bench

               hand, do not refer to the period upto 30.06.2017. It is thus stated that the Applicant has failed to provide

               any evidence to support and corroborate its claims of purported default for the period up to 30.06.2017.

               Thus, in absence of the mandatory evidence, it cannot be deciphered as to on what basis a sum of Rs.

               4390,75,41,611 and US$ 49,684,877 has been claimed in the present Application.

               (b) Calculations for the purported claims are incorrect and wrong:


               The  amounts  as  claimed  by  the  Applicant  (as  detailed  in  Annexure  7  to  the  Application/Form  1)  are
               categorised as under:


               1.      Term Loan:

               (a). Principal Amount


               (b). Interest Amount


               2.      Working Capital Accounts:

               (a). Principal Amount


               (b). Interest Amount


               (i) Discrepancies in the alleged principal as well as interest amounts under Term Loan:

               In Part IV, Sr. No. 2 of the Application, an amount of Rs. 4390,75,41,611 and US$ 49,684,877 has been

               claimed to be the 'amount in default' and details thereof have been provided in Annexure - 7 (Pg. 143-156,
               Vol- I of the Application). It is stated that a perusal of Annexure-7 shows various discrepancies in the
               alleged claimed principal amount and without assigning any basis for the alleged interest amount. This

               fact gets corroborated from perusal of the corresponding individual loan documents. Apart many others,
               some of the glaring discrepancies in the alleged amounts as claimed under the heading"


               20.     There  are  further  allegations  of  wrongful  clubbing  of  Working  Capital  Accounts  under  the
               heading of "Principal Amount in Default" which are as under:-


               "(ii)  Wrongful  clubbing  of  Working  Capital  Accounts  under  the  heading  of  "Principal  Amount  in
               Default"


               It is stated that in the calculation of the alleged default amount in Annexure 7 to the Application, the
               various Working Capital Accounts have been wrongly clubbed under the heading of "Principal Amount in
               Default". In this regard, it is pertinent to mention that at Pg 142, the Applicant itself has stated that "The


                                                                                                           85
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90