Page 35 - A Chain of Miracles

a
u
n
h
y
Y
a
r
H Harun Yahya
a
istence, and that of every life form in the universe, depends. 15
As we have seen, Greenstein (another materialist scientist),
explains this miracle of Creation with “a remarkable chain of
lucky breaks;” a wholly unscientific approach. Exactly because

this is an impossibly unlikely thing to happen by chance,
Greenstein makes the analogy of a very complex and crucial res-
onance between a car, a bicycle and a truck. He fails to call this a
miracle because of his materialist credentials.
Further, some other elements like oxygen were formed by
such extraordinary processes of resonance. Fred Hoyle discov-
ered these extraordinary processes, and in his book Galaxies,

Nuclei and Quasars, he concluded that such precisely structured
processes could not have arisen through the work of coinci-
dences. Despite being a sworn materialist, he conceded that such
double resonances had to be the result of design. 16
In another article, he wrote:
If you wanted to produce carbon and oxygen in roughly equal
quantities by stellar nucleosynthesis, these are the two levels you
would have to fix, and your fixing would have to be just about
where these levels are actually found to be…A commonsense in-
terpretation of the facts suggests that a super intellect has mon-
keyed with physics, as well as chemistry and biology, and that
there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. The
numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelm-
ing as to put this conclusion almost beyond question. 17

This miraculous process so affected Hoyle that he was con-
vinced other scientists could not possibly ignore this clear fact:
I do not believe that any scientist who examined the evidence
would fail to draw the inference that the laws of nuclear physics
have been deliberately designed with regard to the consequences
they produce inside the stars. 18

3 33
3