Page 538 - Atlas of Creation Volume 3

Today, the horse series
gives evolutionists
nothing to hope for. It
has been discovered

that horses lived at
the same time as their
supposed ancestors
and even side by side

with them, and so evi-
dently there is no way to
establish an ancestral lin-
eage among them.

Besides, many character-
istics discovered in the
tooth and bone structure of
horses invalidate this se-

quence. All this points to one
Scientific research has revealed that the scenario of the horse's "evolution" is total
evident fact: There was never
Earth.
conjecture, a myth devoid of any reality. Like all other living things, horses came into
any evolutionary relationship
being as horses and have never altered throughout the course of their existence on
among these sequenced creatures.
As with all others, these genera in their fossil layers ap-
peared all at once. Despite all their efforts, evolutionists have not been able to demonstrate transitional
characteristics among these genera, and it's worth a closer look at the horse series that Darwinists once de-
fended so intently.

Inconsistency and Admissions by Evolutionists

Contrary to the evolutionist scenario displayed in museums and textbooks, the horse series is inconsis-
tent in terms of various criteria. First of all, evolutionists have not been able to establish any connection be-
tween Eohippus (or Hyracotherium), which they claim begins the sequence, and condylarths, supposedly the
ancestors of ungulates. 129
In addition, there are inconsistencies within the horse series. Some of the creatures included in the se-

quence are proven to have lived at the same time as one another. In January, 1981, National Geographic pub-
lished the surprising report that researchers in Nebraska, USA came across thousands of
10-million-year-old fossils that had been preserved after a sudden volcanic eruption. This news dealt a se-

vere blow to the scenario of horse evolution, because the published photographs of these fossils showed
both three-toed and one-toed horses, 130 refuting the claim that genera in the horse series evolved from one
another. These creatures, claimed to have an ancestral connection, actually lived at the same time and in the
same place, and demonstrated no transitional characteristics that could prove evolution. This discovery
demonstrated that the evolutionist propaganda of the horse series, long disseminated in museums and

textbooks, was completely imaginary and assembled on the basis of preconceptions.
A greater inconsistency committed in the name of Darwinism was Mesohippus and its supposed ances-
tors. Jonathan Wells, noted for his criticism of Darwinism in his Icons of Evolution, writes that although

Miohippus actually appeared in the fossil record before Mesohippus, it persists after it. 131
Interestingly, O.C. Marsh himself mentioned the existence of three-toed horses living in southwestern
America at that time and that in this respect, they resembled the extinct Protohippus. 132 The inconsistency of
the horse series lies not only in the fact that a genera existed in the same time and place as the so-called "an-
cestor" from which it claimed linear descent. No isolated area of the world can be taken by itself as evidence

that horses came to be through an evolutionary process. Evolutionists have assembled fragments of fossils

536 Atlas of Creation Vol. 3