Page 171 - Confessions of the Evolutionists
P. 171

Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar)                  169




                 level of development of science. Indeed, looking at those extraordinary
                 individual features in the formations of a single protein carrying out bio-
                 logical functions, it appears impossible to explain a large number of
                 atoms combining together, all in the correct and requisite sequence, at
                 the right time and moment and with the right electrical and mechanical
                 features, all in terms of chance. 430

                 No matter how large the universe may be, chance giving rise to the birth
                 of protein and nucleic acid is [an] impossibility that... 431

                 It is of course possible to account for the story of the birth of the world in
                 all its details, and the emergence of the complex structure of the building
                 blocks of living organisms in particular, with the possibility of a planned
                 course being followed and  the direct intervention of a supernatural
                 power. In fact, we can ascribe the conditions on Earth, and ask why sub-
                 sequent developments occurred in such an astonishing way as to meet the
                 requirements of life, as if this had been foreseen beforehand, only to the
                 intention to create life from one end of the world to the other of a
                 Creator existing beyond nature, omnipotent. 432
                 The question posed in a mocking tone of voice by one ever-present celebri-
                 ty during a debate on the origin of life constitutes a well-known example
                 on this subject: "How long would a human being's 1,000 trillion atoms
                 have to be mixed up for a Volkswagen to emerge by chance?" Another
                 variation of the same question is "How long would 100 monkeys have to sit
                 randomly tapping the keys of a typewriter until they produced a single one
                 of Shakespeare's sonnets?" Such objections are really astonishing. 433

                 The life span of the Earth would be insufficient for cytochrome-C (or
                 any other enzyme currently in existence) to be manufactured once again
                 in exactly that form out of coincidences. 434
                 It is more reasonable seeming to think that the development of animate
                 and inanimate nature is the work of a single moment, a flash of cre-
                 ation... 435
                 Attempting to produce a conclusion on the basis that life is the work of
                 a miracle may more reasonable in the current state of affairs. 436
                 Pierre-Paul Grassé is a French biologist and former president of
            the French Academy of Sciences:
                 The opportune appearance of mutations permitting animals and plants to
                 meet their needs seems hard to believe. Yet the Darwinian theory is even
                 more demanding: A single plant, a single animal would require thou-
   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176