Page 175 - Confessions of the Evolutionists

Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar) 173

valid, but because he wished that it were
valid.
Fred Hoyle stood out against all objections as
evidence against this theory began to unfold.
Sciama goes on to say that he had first taken
a stand along with Hoyle but, as evidence be-
gan to pile up, he had to admit that the game
was over and that the steady-state theory had
to be dismissed. 445
Stephen W. Hawking is a British theo-

retical physicist and professor of mathematics
Den nis Sci ama
at the University of Cambridge:
Why should the Universe be in a state of high
order at one end of time, the end that we call the past? Why is it not in a
state of complete disorder at all times? After all, this might seem more
probable. And why is the direction of time in which disorder increases the
same as that in which the Universe expands? One possible view is that
God simply chose that the Universe should be in a smooth and ordered
state at the beginning of the expansion phase. We should not try to un-
derstand why, or question His reasons because the beginning of the
Universe was the work of God. But the whole history of the Universe
could be said to be the work of God. 446

Don N. Page is professor of physics at the University of Alberta:
There is no mechanism known as yet that would allow the Universe to be-
gin in an arbitrary state and then evolve to its present highly ordered
state. 447

Prof. Dr. Ali Demirsoy is a biologist at Hacettepe University and
specializes in zoogeography:
Today, however, we know that infinite time and infinite space belong to
God, that the universe is finite... 448
Hoimar Von Ditfurth:
We cannot know what there was before this point and at its beginning.
That is a sphere closed to science. Even the question of why there was a
beginning is unanswerable. In addition, the questions of the origins of the
first structure of the initial matter, hydrogen, its characteristics, and what
gave rise to that hydrogen, are all parts of this mystery. 449