Page 205 - Global Freemasonry
P. 205

Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar)


                         antenne
                                                     leg
                                           eye









                                       mouth


              Since the beginning of the twentieth century, evolutionary biologists have sought exam-
              ples of beneficial mutations by creating mutant flies. But these efforts have always
              resulted in sick and deformed creatures. The top picture shows the head of a normal
              fruit fly, and the picture on the left shows the head of a fruit fly with legs coming out of
              it, the result of mutation.

            the 1930s. Neo-Darwinism added mutations, which are distortions formed
            in the genes of living beings due to such external factors as radiation or
            replication errors, as the "cause of favorable variations" in addition to nat-
            ural mutation.
                 Today, the model that Darwinists espouse, despite their own aware-
            ness of its scientific invalidity, is neo-Darwinism. The theory maintains

            that millions of living beings formed as a result of a process whereby
            numerous complex organs of these organisms (e.g., ears, eyes, lungs, and
            wings) underwent "mutations," that is, genetic disorders. Yet, there is an
            outright scientific fact that totally undermines this theory: Mutations do
            not cause living beings to develop; on the contrary, they are always
            harmful.
                 The reason for this is very simple: DNA has a very complex struc-

            ture, and random effects can only harm it. The American geneticist B. G.
            Ranganathan explains this as follows:
               First, genuine mutations are very rare in nature. Secondly, most mutations are
               harmful since they are random, rather than orderly changes in the structure of
               genes; any random change in a highly ordered system will be for the worse,
               not for the better. For example, if an earthquake were to shake a highly



                                            203
   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210