Page 16 - CSIV n 3 ENG version
P. 16

On this journey we could realize - in the span of our life -

      everything unimaginable and yet we do not take anything away, we
      leave everything that is matter. Then I have to question myself

      to understand if I should be on this Universe to be a doctor, an

      engineer, a carpenter, an architect, a manager and build

      everything that is possible of material or it is more useful to

      live a life within which I find a dimension of spiritual nature,

      Gnostic, which makes me grasp the sense of existence, for me, for

      others to be rebellious against injustice and arbitrators and
      defender of equity and justice. Here is my good reason for being

      a mason.

      I do not know three of them for not being aware of the lack of

      questions that many people have about why they exist. I also

      think that they have more than three questions but also many,
      many, many non-answers around their person. We live in an era of

      contradictions, social, human, political, religious and often

      have the desire to retire to private life after the

      disappointments.




      GB -

       How do you see the future for those who would like to rediscover the desire for participation?



      TB-

      Good question, but also very complex because one should also have

      divination properties to be able to read the future. Let's try to

      reflect on thinking that all the new has come from the old and,

      like all facts that have happened in human history, have ancient

      roots. The story returns under changed clothes but with a
      different ability to be read by the man who knows the story. That

      man reads it better and the news for the many are for an initiate

      a: everything comes back, just wait, just look for it.

      It seems in fact that fate has in store for us the interpretation

      of a particular message that has existed in a well-defined

      period, a singular coincidence, between the term Resurgence and
      the Renaissance. It is an intimate bond that welds the two words

      and inevitably contains the trace of a journey that ineluctably

      we have the task of following a circular path that wants to go

      back to the past, as for

      obeying the admonition of Plato: "that the ancients are better

      than us and dwell closer to the gods" Renaissance arises a return
      vision or a "creative rereading" we say of the past, rebirth

      looks from an ancient lost gold age take reference to a

      deteriorated topicality of lead, with the certainty that in the

      past there was a lost truth not corrupted by time. And so. every

      time that the defeat of lead is savoured, it is in nature that
      one tries to close oneself and shy away from the gold of the

      past. Not seeing prospects. I believe instead that we are in the

      central phase of the renewal of an ancient narration. The renewal

      of man passes through the new birth of tradition, it is not about

      nostalgic whispers aimed at a past age, it is not the romantic

      re-enactment of a museum heritage and as such to "incense" close
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21