Page 4 - John Hundley 2011
P. 4

comment thereto).  Because the bank’s lien was perfected some 4 years before the ABC was executed, absent
        a special rule, the security interest would trump the assignee’s claim for compensation.

            After surveying various legal provisions, the court said that an assignee cannot be required to forgo
        the payment of the reasonable fees and costs of administering the assignment until perfected security
        interests  have  been  fully  satisfied  because  “if  assignees  were  required  to  forego
        payment in favor of perfected security interests, no assignee would take on the task of
        liquidating  assets,  and  assignments  for  the  benefit  of  creditors  would  cease  to  be
        available  as  an  efficient  method  of  maximizing  the  liquidation  value  of  troubled
        companies”.  Noting the common-law basis for ABCs, the court reasoned that “[i]f the
        General Assembly, in enacting the U.C.C., had intended to foreclose this common-law
        right,  it  would  have,  in  our  view,  clearly  and  explicitly  set  forth  in  the  statute  that  a
        perfected secured creditor such as First Bank has priority over the assignee’s right to
        fees and expenses.”  Because the legislature did not so stipulate, the court found that
        the assignee was entitled to compensation from the assets subject to the bank’s prior lien.

            Several observations inspired by this decision can be offered.
                                  First, the decision easily could have gone the other way, and in the long term may
                              be held incorrectly decided.  The court’s reasoning that the statute should have been
                              explicit if it intended to override ABCs is reminiscent of the doctrine under which statutes
                              in derogation of the common law are strictly construed – but by statute the U.C.C. is to
                              be liberally construed (810 ILCS 5/1-103(a)).
                                  Second, nothing in First Bank changes the fact that ABCs generally will only
                              work with entities.  This is because a key difference between ABCs and bankruptcy is
                              that bankruptcy results in a discharge of debt but ABCs do not.  The discharge is critical
                              for  individuals,  because  they  live  on  after  insolvency  and  need  its  protection.    In
                              contrast, Chapter 7 results in no discharge for a corporation but contemplates that the
                              corporation will simply be dissolved at the end of the bankruptcy.

            Third, because no discharge of debt occurs, the advantage of an ABC over a bankruptcy may be modest
        when  the  debts  have  been  guaranteed  by  individuals.    If  the  individuals  must  be  put  through  bankruptcy
        anyway, the incremental cost and trouble of a related corporate bankruptcy may be minimal.
            Fourth, First Bank illustrates that there are advantages to bankruptcy besides the discharge – including,
        perhaps  most  importantly,  the  automatic  stay.    ABCs  contemplate  an  out-of-court  process  with  the
        assignee in charge – but the assignee can impose no sanction if, as in First Bank, a creditor chooses
        to go to court instead.  The assignee is left to ask the court to enforce his or her rights – which generally it
        will do, but the simplicity and efficiency of the out-of-court scheme can be lost.
            Fifth, First Bank does nothing to assuage the dislike which junior creditors may find with the ABC process.
        Unlike bankruptcy, the threat of criminal prosecution does not hang so clearly over the head of a debtor who
        executes  an  ABC,  and the  assignee  is  unlikely  to give  potential  preferences,  hidden  assets  and fraudulent
        transfers the attention which they would receive in bankruptcy.  That the assignee is selected by the debtor
        also presents questions of disinterestedness and disincentive to question the debtor’s account.  Bankruptcy,
        with all its problems, thus may bring a degree of credibility to the process which an ABC may not.

                                                                                                      John\SharpThinking/#42.doc

        ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
                                            THE SHARP LAW FIRM, P.C.

                    1115 Harrison, P.O. Box 906, Mt. Vernon, IL 62864 • Telephone 618-242-0246 • Facsimile 618-242-1170

           Business Transactions • Litigation • Financial Law • Problem Finances • Real Estate • Corporate • Commercial Disputes • Creditors’ Rights •
                                        Arbitration • Employment Matters • Estate Planning • Probate

              Terry Sharp: law@lotsharp.com; John T. Hundley: Jhundley@lotsharp.com; Bentley J. Bender: Bbender@lotsharp.com;
                                 Real Estate Closing and Title Services, see www.sharptitleservices.com

                                                        Advertising Material
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9