Page 18 - John Hundley 2010
P. 18

Welcoming Bentley Bender


        The Sharp Law Firm, P.C. is pleased to announce that Bentley J. Bender, member of the bars of the states of Missouri,
                           Illinois and Louisiana and of the United States District Courts for the Eastern District of Missouri and
                           the Southern and Central Districts of Illinois, has joined the firm.
                           Ben  has  received  both  a  Juris  Doctorate  and  a  Master  of  Law  in  Taxation  from  Washington
                           University in St. Louis, in 2004 and 2007 respectively, and achieved a double-major B.A. in political
                           science and psychology from Tulane University in New Orleans in 2001.  He graduated cum laude
                           from Tulane University after being named to the Dean’s List.  While attending Washington University
                           School of Law, Ben was honored to receive both the Phillip Gallop Award and the Cali Award for
                           Academic Excellence.  A member of Mensa, he is expected to help the firm broaden its services to
                           clients with tax problems and with other problems where taxes have an impact.
                           Ben has extensive experience in bankruptcy, practicing with the boutique of Macey & Aleman in St.
        Louis before joining the firm. He also was recognized for his work with the Louisiana Transitional Recovery Office of the
        Federal  Emergency  Management  Agency  for  his  efforts  to  aid  in  the  recovery  of  the  city  of  New  Orleans  following
        Hurricane Katrina.
        His practice also includes commercial litigation, business law, creditors’ rights and commercial transactions.
        Ben may be reached at our Mt. Vernon office, 618-242-0246, Bbender@lotsharp.com.
        ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

        and (ii) the court is satisfied that there is a reasonable probability that the mortgagee will prevail on a
        final hearing of the cause”.  Because virtually all mortgages contain  clauses authorizing possession
                           or appointment of a receiver upon default, most hearings seeking
                           such relief in non-residential cases turn on whether the plaintiff
                           has shown “reasonable probability” of success upon final hear-
                           ing.    But  argument  on  that  element  has  been  restricted  by
                           case law defining reasonable probability of success as mere
                           proof there is a default under the mortgage.
            Hence, in commercial cases the plaintiff ordinarily must point only to a default and to the clause in
        the mortgage authorizing mortgagee-in-possession or receivership.  And as to the default, the court
        held the defendants bound by the stipulations to that effect in the “side letter” agreements.
            Defendants in 108 N. State fought on, however, arguing plaintiff had not shown “good cause” for
        receivership.    The  court  rejected  that  appeal,  however,  noting  that  statutory  language  creates  a
        presumption in favor of receivership (or mortgagee in possession) unless the  defendant can show
        good cause for denying such relief.  108 N. State continues the practice of rejecting arguments that
        “good  cause”  exists  because  existing  management  can  manage  property  better  than  the
        proposed receiver (or mortgagee).  It keeps alive the prospect that “good cause” may be shown in
        the form of a transaction which will cure the default, such as a refinance or cash from a new investor.
        However, the court said such relief must be “imminent”, not a mere possibility.

            108 N. State thus teaches the circumstances in which a defaulting mortgagor will be able to defeat
        receivership or a motion for possession are few.  It also teaches that concessions of default required
        to obtain forbearance once a default has occurred must be taken seriously.                   John\SharpThinking\#36.doc
        ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
                                           THE  SHARP  LAW  FIRM,  P.C.

                1115 Harrison, P.O. Box 906, Mt. Vernon, IL 62864 • Telephone 618-242-0246 • Facsimile 618-242-1170 • www.thesharpfirm.com

           Business Transactions • Litigation • Financial Law • Problem Finances • Real Estate • Corporate • Commercial Disputes • Creditors’ Rights •
                                Arbitration • Administrative Law • Employment Matters • Estate Planning • Probate

                               Terry Sharp: law@lotsharp.com; John T. Hundley: Jhundley@lotsharp.com;
                              Jana Yocom: Jyocom@lotsharp.com; Bentley J. Bender, Bbender@lotsharp.com.
                                 Real Estate Closing and Title Services, see www.sharptitleservices.com

                                                        Advertising Material
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23