Page 20 - John Hundley 2009
P. 20

focuses only on “pulling the plug”, this law allows you to delegate to your agent control over “all aspects of
        [your] personal care and medical treatment” (or less if you want).  The statute (and suggested form) also
        permit you to give guidance to your agent as to your preferences on end-of-life issues.

                   Health Care Surrogates.  The HCPA was so well received that in 1991 the legislature
        adopted the Health Care Surrogates Act (755 ILCS 40), which provides that when the patient is unable to
        competently make or express his or her health care decisions, a “surrogate” is empowered to do so.  In
        essence,  this  law  gives  decision  powers  –  much  like  those  given  under  the  HCPA  to  agents  –  to  the
        patient’s relatives, following a hierarchy as stated in the act.  This is “stop gap” legislation – if there is an
        applicable Living Will or HCPA, that document will control.

                   Mental Health Treatment Preference Declarations.  These declarations
        permit one to state in advance (or when he or she is not under the influence of his or her mental illness)
        the individual’s desires on three key mental health treatment issues: psychotropic medications, electro-
                              convulsive treatment, and admission to a facility for short-term mental health treat-
                              ment.  Like an HCPA, a declaration under this act (755 ILCS 43) appoints an individ-
                              ual  to  act  as  agent,  but  unlike  the  HCPA  this  act  requires  the  agent  to  act  in
                              conformance with the wishes expressed in the document.  Indeed, it appears provid-
                              ers may rely on such a declaration in their file even if the stated agent does not so
                              direct.  However, for the declaration to apply, two physicians or a court must deter-
        mine “that my ability to receive and evaluate information effectively or communicate decisions is impaired
        to such an extent that I lack the capacity to refuse or consent to mental health treatment”.

                   The DNR Order.            Under pressure of federal law and with the General Assembly’s con-
        sent (20 ILCS 2310/2310-600, 755 ILCS 40/65), the Department of Public Health
        has  issued  a  “Do  Not  Resuscitate”  (“DNR”)  Advance  Directive  form  which
        patients may execute.  Under an executed form, health care providers are not to
        attempt  cardiopulmonary  resuscitation  (“CPR”)  when  both  breathing  and  heart-
        beat stop, and may or may not (depending on the patient’s instructions) attempt
        CPR when the heart is still beating but breathing is labored or stopped.  Doctors
        also are permitted to enter DNR orders in patients’ records based on advance
        consultation with the patient or alternate decision makers.  DNR orders address only resuscitation and not
        the broader scope of care which may be covered by any of the preceding documents.

                   The Changes.   Effective Jan. 1, 2010,  in addition to the documents discussed above,
        health care facilities must maintain  in their files  any “declaration of a potential surrogate or surrogates
        should the person become incapacitated” (P.A.  96-448).  This conforms that provision  to  others  which
        permit substitute decision-makers to submit end-of-life decisions for the patient in advance of the critical
        point being reached (755 ILCS 40/65(b)).  Recent legislation also omits a limitation that keeping of such
        records was required only “for the duration of the patient’s stay” (P.A. 96-492).
          Other legislation requires that witnesses to DNR orders attest that the maker of the order (1) had an
        opportunity  to  read  it  and  (2)  signed  or  acknowledged  the  signature  in  the  witness’  presence.    While
        increasing those requirements, the amendment permits one witness, rather than two, to suffice (P.A. 96-
        765).
                                                                                                     John\Sharp Thinking\#25.doc
        ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
                                            THE SHARP LAW FIRM, P.C.

                    1115 Harrison, P.O. Box 906, Mt. Vernon, IL 62864 • Telephone 618-242-0246 • Facsimile 618-242-1170

           Business Transactions • Litigation • Financial Law • Problem Finances • Real Estate • Corporate • Commercial Disputes • Creditors’ Rights •
                            Arbitration • White Collar Criminal Defense • Employment Matters • Estate Planning • Probate

              Terry Sharp: law@lotsharp.com; John T. Hundley: Jhundley@lotsharp.com; David J. Grindle, Dgrindle@lotsharp.com;
                 Mandy Combs: Mcombs@lotsharp.com; Real Estate Closing and Title Services, see www.sharptitleservices.com

                                                        Advertising Material
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25