Page 18 - John Hundley 2009
P. 18

Merger of Prior Taxes into Tax Deed Does Not Apply Until Deed Is Properly Issued

          The merger of prior taxes into a tax deed does not apply until a tax deed is properly issued under 35
        ILCS 200/22-40(a), a panel in the First District has ruled.
          In Application of County Treasurer, 389 Ill.App.3d 398 (2009), the assignee of the buyer of 2000-01
                                 taxes sought a deed wiping out liens of subsequent sales of 1987-88 taxes (sold
                                 to a different purchaser) under the proviso in 35 ILCS 200/22-40(b) that the court
                                 in issuing such a deed “find[s] that the lien of those delinquent taxes has been or
                                 will be merged into the tax deed grantee’s title”.  Arguing that the 1987-88 taxes
                                 had  been  delinquent  when  his  assignor  bought  the  2000-01  taxes,  plaintiff
                                 prevailed on the trial court to merge those liens into the deed he received, without
                                 redeeming them.  The Appellate Court reversed, because § 22-40(a) requires, for
                                 issuance of the deed, that “all forfeitures and sales which occur subsequent to the
                                 sale have been redeemed”.  Although the taxes at issue were for years prior to
        the plaintiff’s claim, their sale occurred after his assignor’s purchase.  Thus, a deed could not properly be
        issued without those taxes being redeemed, and since they had not been, the deed was ineffective.
          In Application of County Collector, 391 Ill.App.3d 656 (2009), another panel recently agreed.  There the
        issue was whether a tax purchaser had to give certain notices under other provisions of the Property Tax
        Code  to  subsequent  purchasers  of  subsequent  years’  taxes.    Because  the  court  found  such  notice
        required and not given, the application for a deed was improper, it said.
             Merger By Deed Does Not Apply to Mutual Mistake About Tax Assessments

          The  doctrine  of  merger  by  deed  does  not  apply  when  the  parties  to  a  transaction  make  a  mutual
        mistake regarding property tax assessments, the Illinois Supreme Court has held.
          In Czarobski v. Lata, 227 Ill.2d 364 (2008), the contract provided for proration at
        closing  and  execution  at  closing  of  an  agreement  for  final  proration  “when  the
        complete assessment information is available”.  That agreement was not executed,
        the court said, because the parties were mutually mistaken as to the accuracy of
        recent  tax  information.    After  closing,  taxes  were  changed  far  more  than  the
        preliminary  statement  relied  upon  would  have  indicated.    Under  those  circum-
        stances, the doctrine of mutual mistake prevented the doctrine of merger by deed from applying, it ruled.

                   Creating Judgment Lien Requires Strict Compliance With Statute

          Creating a judgment lien by recording against realty requires strict compliance with 735 ILCS5/12-101,
        the  First  District  has  ruled.    In  Maniez  v.  Citibank,  383  Ill.App.3d  38  (2008),  the  court  noted  that  at
                               common law a judgment did not create a lien on real estate, and that the judgment
                               lien was “purely a statutory creation.”  To be effective, a memorandum of judgment
         OOPS!                 must  be  recorded  and  an  enforceable  judgment  must  stand  behind  the

                               memorandum, the court said, with “enforceable judgment” meaning one on which
                               execution may issue.  Because the memorandum in Maniez contained a typo as to
        the judgment date, it referred the reader to a non-existent judgment and was ineffective, the court ruled.

                                                                  --John Hundley, Jhundley@lotsharp.com, 618-242-0246
                                                                                                      John\Sharp Thinking\#24.doc
        ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
                                            THE SHARP LAW FIRM, P.C.

                    1115 Harrison, P.O. Box 906, Mt. Vernon, IL 62864 • Telephone 618-242-0246 • Facsimile 618-242-1170

           Business Transactions • Litigation • Financial Law • Problem Finances • Real Estate • Corporate • Commercial Disputes • Creditors’ Rights •
                            Arbitration • White Collar Criminal Defense • Employment Matters • Estate Planning • Probate

              Terry Sharp: law@lotsharp.com; John T. Hundley: Jhundley@lotsharp.com; David J. Grindle, Dgrindle@lotsharp.com;
                 Mandy Combs: Mcombs@lotsharp.com; Real Estate Closing and Title Services, see www.sharptitleservices.com

                                                        Advertising Material
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23