Page 27 - GP Fall Final 2017
P. 27

Improving Outcomes for Periodontal Patients:

                             The Role of Oral Microbiology Testing

               What you can do in office when a patient’s periodontal challenge persists.

                                           By Lorna Flamer-Caldera, DDS, FAGD, FACD

        Periodontal care is a mainstay of the general  likely to produce a favorable outcome.   As clinicians,  we can decide  to repeat
        dental practice. Each new patient receives a                              Phase I treatment, change  the adjunctive
        “workup” – basic assessments and hygiene  The  microbiology  of  periodontal  disease  therapies  such as oral  rinses that  provide
        care. It is expected that they will comply  became known in the 1800s through Ameri-  chemical  support, or refer  to a specialist.
        with homecare instructions and adhere to a  can microbiologist W.D Miller and German  Ideally, we aim to avoid clinical failure and
        recall schedule. Of course, there are some  dentist Adolph Witzel.  For many decades  prevent advancement to Phase II surgical
                                                               3
        instances, where the degree of care needed  dentistry promulgated Miller’s non-specif-  therapy. 7
        is best addressed by referral to a periodon-  ic plaque hypothesis of oral disease arising
        tist. The expected outcome for those who  from the normal oral flora. Current adher-  Case selection for oral microbiology sam-
        remain  in the practice  is improvement  in  ence to the  ecological  plaque hypothesis  pling  is based on evaluating  for signs of
        periodontal status, reduction in inflamma-  and more recent  keystone-pathogen  hy-  active  disease  after  all  appropriate  thera-
        tion, and an improved clinical appearance.  pothesis has placed  consideration  of the  pies have been applied. Measurable and
        Generally, these  patients  fall  within  the  microbial nature of periodontal disease at  non-measurable indicators of alteration in
        American  Association  of Periodontology  the forefront of treatment. 4,5  the oral flora and periodontal complex have
        (AAP) case Type I, II, and, with caution,                                 already  been  noted,  such as radiographic
        Type III.  This outcome expectation sup-  Therefore, the standard for treatment suc-  osseous changes,  bleeding,  plaque  index,
        ports the general dentist’s decision that the  cess should reflect a microbial distinction.  tissue  tone  and  consistency,  mouth  odor,
        patient’s periodontal needs are within the  Improvements  in clinical  assessments al-  and pocket  depths. Patients  who exhibit
        scope of care of their practice. But some  ways reflect a change in the oral microflora.  persistent  low  level  inflammation,  con-
        patients don’t respond well over time and  Clinical  assessment  improvements  reflect  tinued  bone loss, and  prolonged bleeding
        their oral health status continues to indicate  microbial changes.        upon probing, are candidates for bacterial
        active disease, when viewed according to                                  culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing.
        the determinants of periodontal status such  With our standard procedure for establish-  It at this point that OMT proves its benefits
        as pocket depths, bleeding and tissue tone.  ing periodontal status, we can assess and  in advancing patients to health.
        What has been missed?  The answer can  diagnose our patient to identify the thera-
        lie within the microbiology of the patient’s  peutic treatment we will prescribe. In addi-  What OMT provides in these situations is
        periodontium.                        tion to medical history, we use established  both an unprecedented level of specificity
                                             assessment markers such as pocket depth,  about  the  periodontal  microflora  of  each
        Developments  in Oral Microbiology  bleeding (in all its parameters), tissue ede-  patient and the antibiotic sensitivity profile
        Testing (OMT) have made  it possible to  ma, sulcular exudate,  oral habits, plaque  that enables us to prescribe appropriately.
        achieve  highly  beneficial  outcomes  for  index, occlusion, and presence  of caries  When antibiotic therapy is utilized without
        stubborn periodontal  types and to con-  to arrive at a treatment plan that we hope  the benefit of OMT, it risks being imprecise
        firm  the  presence  of  pathogens  in  early  offers a predictable  outcome.  That  plan  and,  thus, impotent.  Knowing exactly
                                                                      6
        periodontal  cases  where  few  determinant  routinely  includes  in-office  and  at-home  which pathogenic bacteria are causing the
        markers of disease are evident.  Since the  components designed to synergistically re-  condition allows us to treat in an effective
                                  1
        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention  solve the periodontal assessment concerns.  and lasting way.
        have determined that the incidence of adult  At the end of Phase I therapy, we reassess
        periodontitis in the United States is higher  to determine the degree to which the condi-  Periodontal infection is not a surface dis-
        than 47%, the ability to change the course  tion has been resolved. This re-evaluation  ease and its proper management  lies in
        of disease development by identifying the  process can range from simple for cases of  treatment that goes beyond surface repair.
        early culprits in oral microflora changes is  gingivitis to complex for cases of periodon-  One should not overlook or forget the ef-
        significant.  A fair number of people with  tal disease. Both would include evaluation  fect of microbial penetration of tissue at the
                 2
        periodontally involved dentitions will not  for complete  mechanical  debridement  of  site.  While it is appropriate for treatment
                                                                                     8
        seek dental care and will not understand the  root surfaces (and its inherent disruption of  goals to involve halting the progression of
        disease process beyond the risk of pain or  biofilm) along with the “hope” that the mi-  disease,  they  should  also clearly address
        eventual tooth loss. For this group, an op-  crobial ecology of disease has been elim-  the  restoration  of  normal  oral  microflora.
        portunity to discuss the systemic impact of  inated. But too often we find that despite  The ultimate goal of antimicrobial therapy
        periodontal disease will not present itself.  our best  clinical  efforts and  the  patient’s  is to change, on a sustained basis, the mi-
        But for those who do seek care, we should  diligent implementation of homecare rec-  crobiological profile of subgingival biofilm
        look  to  provide  service  which  results  in  ommendations, the expected reduction of  to one which is found in periodontal health.
        long-term success. By being able to iden-  bleeding and periodontal pocket depth has
        tify the specific microflora, we can provide  not occurred.               Another important  reason a sustained
        a clear direction for treatment that is more                              solution  is desirable  arises  from the




                                                                                      www.nysagd.org l Fall 2017 l GP 23
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32