Page 106 - The Track Of The Jew Through The Ages - Alfred Rosenberg
P. 106

The Track of the Jew through the Ages


         through the plundering of the inhabitants carried out with demonic
         energy throughout the social structure.
                If philo-Jewish scholars and, naturally, all Jews throw the
         entire blame of these upheavals of national life onto the kings and
         maintain that they had only used the poor Jew, taken away his money
         from him, but thereby forced him to live on usury, it is of course far
         from my intention to represent the kings as innocent angels. They
         needed money for wars and the maintenance of the court and were
         not especially selective in their methods of obtaining such for
         themselves. That the Jew, who always disposed of money, seemed
         to them very welcome many times can be well believed even if it is
         not expressly proven.
                In the life ofthe young nations of that time things fermented
         and brewed everywhere, great movements of the wildly fermenting
        brew swept through the world; wars broke out, but at the same time
        formed the national personalities. Every prince defended himself
        with his life against another until a greater united them both under
        his sceptre.
                In these times, when  it was a matter mainly of national
        existence, one cannot achieve much with moralising judgements,
        and to want to grant absolute impunity in the case of every turmoil
        to the small minority of Jews alone would also be asking too much.
        Nevertheless, even if we could quite calmly consider the prince
        constantly in need ofmoney as a tempter ofthe Jew, the fact however
        remains that it was precisely Jews who always played the above
        described role of usurer.
               To the one-sided opinion that the Jews could have done
        nothing else but conduct usury can be opposed the simple question
        why they did not turn, as Louis le Hutin  167  and Louis IX had wished
                                                 168
        to force them to, to manufacture and agriculture.  Then there would
        have been no Jewish question also.
               If we leave aside here every moral evaluation, we must
        indeed understand all the events repeating themselves constantly,
        with the same results, as necessities of Nature that formed

          [Louis X (1289-1316) was known as "le Hutin", the quarreller.]
                                               th
          The prohibition to own land dates only from the 13  century.
                                                                83
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111