Page 130 - International guidelines for groin hernia management

Hernia

patients: a short-term double-blind RCT. Hernia 16:133–144. trial. Hernia 16(5):561–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0883-0 012-0943-0
150. Lermite E, Arnaud JP (2012) Prospective randomized study 167. Ripetti V, La Vaccara V, Greco S, Bono F, Valeri S, Coppola R
comparing quality of life after Shouldice or mesh plug repair for (2014) Randomised trial comparing Lichtenstein vs Trabucco vs
inguinal hernia: short-term results. Surg Technol Int 22:101–106 Valenti techniques in inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 18:205–212.
151. Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H, Strand L et al (2004) The Danish https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1089-4
Hernia Data Base—four years’ results. Ugeskr Laeger 168. Kapischke M, Schulze H, Caliebe A (2010) Self-fixating mesh
166:1894–1898 for the Lichtenstein procedure—a prestudy. Langenbeck’s Arch
152. Bisgaard T, Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H (2008) Re-recurrence Surg 395:317–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-010-0597-2
after operation for recurrent inguinal hernia. A nationwide 169. Bruna Esteban M, Cantos Pallares M, Artigues Sanchez De
8-year follow-up study on the role of type of repair. Ann Surg Rojas E (2010) Use of adhesive mesh in hernioplasty compared
247(4):707–711. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA. to the conventional technique. Results of a randomised
0b013e31816b18e3 prospective study. [Spanish] TT—Utilizacion de mallas
153. Malik A, Bell C, Stukel T, Urbach D (2015) Recurrence of autoadhesivas en la hernioplastia frente a la tecnica conven-
inguinal hernias repaired in a large hernia surgical specialty cional. Resultados de un estudio pr. Cir Esp 88:253–258
hospital and general hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Can J Surg 170. Kingsnorth A, Gingell-Littlejohn M, Nienhuijs S et al (2012)
1–7. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.003915 Randomized controlled multicenter international clinical trial of
154. Arvidsson D, Berndsen FH, Larsson LG et al (2005) Random- self-gripping Parietex ProGrip polyester mesh versus light-
ized clinical trial comparing 5-year recurrence rate after weight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair:
laparoscopic versus Shouldice repair of primary inguinal hernia. interim results at 3 months. Hernia 16:287–294. https://doi.org/
Br J Surg 92(9):1085–1091. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5137 10.1007/s10029-012-0900-y
155. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM (1989) 171. Pierides G, Scheinin T, Remes V, Hermunen K, Vironen J
The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 157(2):188–193. (2012) Randomized comparison of self-fixating and sutured
https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(89)90526-6 mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 99:630–636.
156. Robbins AW, Rutkow IM (1993) The mesh-plug hernioplasty. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8705
Surg Clin North Am 73(3):501–512 172. Jorgensen LN, Sommer T, Assaadzadeh S et al (2013) Ran-
157. Trabucco E (1993) The office hernioplasty and the Trabucco domized clinical trial of self-gripping mesh versus sutured mesh
repair. Ann Ital Chir 64(2):127–149 for Lichtenstein hernia repair. Br J Surg 100:474–481.
158. Murphy JW (2001) Use of the prolene hernia system for inguinal https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9006
hernia repair: retrospective, comparative time analysis versus 173. Zhang C, Li F, Zhang H, Zhong W, Shi D, Zhao Y (2013) Self-
other inguinal hernia repair systems. Am Surg 67(10):919–923 gripping versus sutured mesh for inguinal hernia repair: a sys-
159. Zhao G, Gao P, Ma B, Tian J, Yang K (2009) Open mesh tematic review and meta-analysis of current literature. J Surg
techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of ran- Res 185(2):653–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.07.035
domized controlled trials. Ann Surg 250:35–42. https://doi.org/ 174. Sajid MS, Farag S, Singh KK, Miles WF (2014) Systematic
10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad63cc review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled
160. Li J, Ji Z, Li Y (2012) Comparison of mesh-plug and Lichten- trials comparing the role of self-gripping mesh against suture
stein for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized mesh fixation in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair.
controlled trials. Hernia 16:541–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/ Updat Surg 66:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-013-
s10029-012-0974-6 0237-9
161. Nienhuijs SW, Rosman C (2015) Long-term outcome after 175. Li J, Ji Z, Li Y (2014) The comparison of self-gripping mesh
randomizing prolene hernia system, mesh plug repair and and sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: the results of
Lichtenstein for inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 19:77–81. meta-analysis. Ann Surg 259(6):1080–1085. https://doi.org/10.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1295-8 1097/SLA.0000000000000408
162. Droeser RA, Dell-Kuster S, Kurmann A et al (2014) Long-term 176. Pandanaboyana S, Mittapalli D, Rao A, Prasad R, Ahmad N
follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of Lichtenstein’s (2014) Meta-analysis of self-gripping mesh (Progrip) versus
operation versus mesh plug repair for inguinal hernia. Ann Surg sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Surg J R Coll Surg
259:966–972. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000297 Edinb Irel 12:87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2013.11.
163. Sanjay P, Watt DG, Ogston SA, Alijani A, Windsor JA (2012) 024
Meta-analysis of Prolene Hernia System mesh versus Lichten- 177. Fang Z, Zhou J, Ren F, Liu D (2014) Self-gripping mesh versus
stein mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Surg J R Coll Surg sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: system review and
Edinb Irel 10:283–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2012.06. meta-analysis. Am J Surg 207(5):773–781. https://doi.org/10.
001 1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.045
164. Pierides G, Vironen J (2011) A prospective randomized clinical 178. Chatzimavroudis G, Papaziogas B, Koutelidakis I et al (2014)
trial comparing the prolene hernia system and the Lichtenstein Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair using
patch technique for inguinal hernia repair in long term: 2- and polypropylene mesh fixed with sutures vs. self-fixating
5-year results. Am J Surg 202:188–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/ polypropylene mesh: a prospective randomized comparative
j.amjsurg.2010.06.027 study. Hernia 18:193–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-
165. Karateke F, Ozyazici S, Menekse E et al (2014) ULTRAPRO 1211-7
hernia system versus Lichtenstein repair in treatment of primary 179. Nikkolo C, Vaasna T, Murruste M, Seepter H, Suumann J, Tein
inguinal hernias: a prospective randomized controlled study. Int A, Kirsimagu U, Lepner U (2015) Single-center, single-blinded,
Surg 99:391–397. https://doi.org/10.9738/INTSURG-D-14- randomized study of self-gripping versus sutured mesh in open
00064.1 inguinal hernia repair. J Surg Res 194(1):77–82. https://doi.org/
166. Mutter D, Champault G, Binot D, Vix M, Leroy J, Marescaux J 10.1016/j.jss.2014.09.017
(2012) PerFix plug versus 4DDOME implants for inguinal 180. Porrero JL, Castillo MJ, Pe ´rez-Zapata A et al (2015) Ran-
hernia repair: prospective multicentric randomised controlled domised clinical trial: conventional Lichtenstein vs. hernioplasty
with self-adhesive mesh in bilateral inguinal hernia surgery.

123