Page 15 - International guidelines for groin hernia management
P. 15

Hernia

           General introduction                                 In the 2009 European Guidelines, raw data were used to
           Choosing the best or most suitable groin hernia repair  conclude that laparo-endoscopic and open repair were
           technique is a true challenge. The best operative technique  comparable in long-term follow-up of a minimum of
           should have the following attributes: low risk of compli-  48 months. 3, 142
           cations (pain and recurrence), (relatively) easy to learn, fast  When reading this chapter, we should realize that
           recovery, reproducible results and cost effectiveness. The  potential biases exist and these are caused by: lack of a
           decision is also dependent upon many factors like: hernia  clear chronic pain definition, variations in duration of
           characteristics, anesthesia type, the surgeon’s preference,  chronic pain, age differences for the risk of chronic pain,
           training, capabilities and logistics. The patient’s wishes  lack of a generally agreed-upon classification system
           must be considered. There are cultural differences between  describing the type of hernias, differences in level of sur-
           surgeons, countries and regions. Emotions may play a role  gical expertise, differences in case load needed to maintain
           as well.                                           a certain technique, safety issues regarding training of the
             Accordingly, the HerniaSurge Group had some pas-  surgeons/residents in the world in difficult techniques like
           sionate discussions when developing this chapter. One  the TEP and TAPP, and costs of procedures, amongst
           single standard technique for all hernias does not exist (see  others. In fact, all these factors must be considered when
           also Chapter 7 on individualization).              studying the evidence presented in the different chapters.
             In most situations a mesh repair is preferred. However, a  The chapters were researched and written by different
           minority of surgeons hold the opinion that mesh use should  teams, but the statements and recommendations were
           be avoided as much as possible. There is an ongoing dis-  agreed upon by the whole HerniaSurge Group. Many lively
           cussion concerning the results of specialist centers like The  discussions during the meetings and via email led to an
           Lichtenstein Hernia Clinic and The Shouldice Hospital.  internet consensus vote. There are recommendations that
           There are low-resource settings where mesh cannot be  have been upgraded. The support for these decisions is at
           afforded. There are high-volume laparo-endoscopic sur-  the end of each chapter.
           geons who passionately advocate a TEP or TAPP in almost
           all cases. There are special mesh implants (often expen-  Key questions
           sive) used by surgeons who have been successful with them  KQ06.a Which non-mesh technique is the preferred repair
           for many years. How then can one reconcile these opinions  method for inguinal hernias?
           and conflicts?                                      KQ06.b Which is the preferred repair method for inguinal
             Although accurate and recent facts are not available, in  hernias: mesh or non-mesh?
           most countries the Lichtenstein repair is probably the first  KQ06.c Which is the preferred open mesh technique for
           choice in a majority of cases. It is a very good technique,  inguinal hernias: Lichtenstein or other open flat mesh and
           but its outcomes may be bettered by a more difficult  implants via an anterior approach?
           technique like the TEP when early postoperative recovery  KQ06.d Which is preferred open mesh technique: Licht-
           and the occurrence of chronic pain are considered. It is  enstein versus open pre-peritoneal?
           self-evident that a surgeon performing a technique and  KQ06.e Is TEP or TAPP the preferred laparo-endoscopic
           striving for optimal results should know the technique very  technique for inguinal hernias?
           well. Excellent training and a high caseload are the foun-  KQ06.f When considering recurrence, pain, learning
           dations of good surgery.                           curve, postoperative recovery and costs which is preferred
             When comparing the best Lichtenstein outcomes with  technique for inguinal hernias: best open mesh (Lichten-
           the best TEP/TAPP, it is noted that the differences are very  stein) or a laparo-endoscopic (TEP and TAPP) technique?
           small. It is challenging though when examining results  KQ06.g In males with unilateral primary inguinal hernias
           reported in the literature because often the techniques being  which is the preferred repair technique, laparo-endoscopic
           compared are not performed in a standardized manner by  (TEP/TAPP) or open pre-peritoneal?
           equally skilled and experienced surgeons. Therefore, this  KQ06.h Which is the preferred technique in bilateral
           might not be true when comparing an average Lichtenstein  inguinal hernias? Open mesh or laparo-endoscopic
           to an average TEP/TAPP or Shouldice because of the  approach?
           former’s lower complexity. Furthermore, applying research
           results to the approach for an individual patient is prob-  Key question
           lematic as well. It is often far from clear whether the results  KQ06.a Which non-mesh technique is the preferred repair
           of an RCT can be generalized to one’s practice setting or  method for inguinal hernias?
           patients within that setting.





                                                                                                      123
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20