Page 110 - Washington Nonprofit Handbook 2018 Edition
P. 110

d.     “Excess Benefit”

                       An  “excess  benefit  transaction”  is  any  transaction  in  which  a  501(c)(3)  or

               501(c)(4) organization provides an economic benefit, either directly or indirectly, to
               a disqualified person, where the value of that economic benefit exceeds any value
               that the organization receives in return, including the value of services performed
               for the organization.  For example, the payment of a salary of $50,000 for services,
               where  the  fair  market  value  of  the  services  is  $25,000,  is  an  excess  benefit
               transaction.

                       Reasonable  expenses  for  board  members  to  attend  meetings,  as  long  as
               these  do  not  include  luxury  travel  or  payments  for  spouses,  do  not  constitute
               excess benefit transactions.  Similarly, benefits provided to the public in exchange
               for  an  annual  membership  fee  of  $75  or  less,  such  as  discounted  admission  to
               events or receipt of a newsletter, do not constitute excess benefits.


                       e.     Rebuttable Presumption of Reasonableness


                       An organization can establish a rebuttable presumption that a transaction is
               reasonable  (and  therefore  not  an  excess  benefit  transaction)  when  the  three
               requirements set out below are satisfied.  In general, organizations should seek to
               satisfy  the  rebuttable  presumption  in  approving  any  transaction  with  or
               compensation  involving  a  potential  disqualified  person,  including  payment  of  a
               salary.    If  an  organization  is  unable  to  establish  the  rebuttable  presumption,
               however, there is no inference that it is an excess benefit transaction.  The three
               requirements are:


                              1)     Approval  by  Independent  Board  or  Committee.   The
                                     transaction  must  be  approved  by  a  board  or  committee
                                     authorized under state law and composed entirely of individuals
                                     who  do  not  have  a  conflict  of  interest  with  regard  to  the
                                     transaction  and  are  not  related  to  or  under  the  direction  and
                                     control  of  a  disqualified  person  who  does  have  a  conflict  of
                                     interest.

                              2)     Appropriate  Comparability  Data.   The  board  or  committee
                                     must rely on appropriate comparability data.  The issue of what
                                     data is appropriate is critical.


                                     y      Where  the  transaction  involves  the  purchase  or  sale  of
                                            property, an independent appraisal is appropriate data.






               WASHINGTON NONPROFIT HANDBOOK                -99-                                        2018
   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115