Page 305 - Washington Nonprofit Handbook 2018 Edition
P. 305

apply to regulatory enforcement by a governmental unit.  Actions that have been
               allowed to continue despite a bankruptcy petition have included the revocation of a
               nonprofit’s charter and revocation of tax-exempt status.  In the matter of Jesus Loves
               You, Inc., 40 B.R. 42 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1984); Universal Life Church, Inc. v. United States,
               128 F.3d 1294 (9th Cir 1997).


                       Once a petition is filed, a bankruptcy estate is created consisting of all of the
               debtor’s property and interests in property.  The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and
               Consumer Protection Act (“BAPCPA”) amended the bankruptcy code to require that
               the  distribution  of  property  from  federally  tax-exempt  organizations  comply  with
               non-bankruptcy law.  One issue, then, for nonprofits in the bankruptcy context is
               the  identification  of  the  bankruptcy  estate.    For  example,  the  treatment  of
               restricted  gifts,  endowments,  pledges  and  other  forms  of  gifts  and  donations
               carrying limitations on their use may not be clear.  The restrictions may prevent the
               funds from  becoming  part of the  bankruptcy estate.    If  restricted  gifts  and other
               assets  survive  the  bankruptcy,  the  courts  can  use  the  doctrine  of  cy  pres  to
               distribute the gifts in a way that carries out the intent of the donor.  Under the cy
               pres doctrine, assets are used for another charitable purpose that most closely lines
               up  with  the  donor’s  intent  when  the  original  purpose  becomes  impossible,
               impracticable, or illegal.


                       Directors  and  officers  should  follow  the  restrictions  placed  on  gifts  to  the
               corporation.  Ignoring restrictions was costly to the Allegheny Health, Education and
               Research  Foundation.    The  directors  and  officers  of  that  foundation  paid  $94
               million  to  settle  claims  brought  by  the  attorney  general.    Other  risks  include
               exposing  otherwise  restricted  gifts  to  creditor  claims.    (Brody,  supra  at  487-88;
               Robert White, Charities in Distress: Selected Issues, ABI-CLE (July 13-16, 2006).


                       BAPCPA also amended the bankruptcy code to allow a greater role for the
               state and attorney general in bankruptcy proceedings where charitable assets are
               at  stake.    Daniel  J.  Callaghan,  An  Overview  of  the  Role  of  the  Attorney  General  in
               Bankruptcy  Proceedings  Involving  Charitable  Organizations,  ABI-CLE  207  (July  13-16,
               2006).    Several  provisions  of  BAPCPA  are  applicable  to  the  bankruptcy  of  health
               care  facilities  (both  profit  and  nonprofit)  including  special  procedures  to  protect
               patient privacy and an exception to the automatic stay for the Secretary of Health
               and  Human  Services.    Nonprofit  health  care  facilities  should  take  special  care  to
               ensure that they are complying with the new bankruptcy requirements.












               WASHINGTON NONPROFIT HANDBOOK                -294-                                       2018
   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310