Page 28 - EFI-RAV ZILBERSTIN_VOL 8.EFI-RAV ZILBERSTIN_VOL 8.1A
P. 28

Pg: 28 - 1-Front 21-10-31

         who emits semen for naught is liable for the death penalty, for it says
         about Er and Onan (Bereishis 38:10),“What he did was evil in Hash-
         em’s eyes and He put him to death too.” This was the manner in which
         the generation of the Flood were corrupt, as it says (ibid.6:12),“For all
         flesh had corrupted its way [of life] on the earth”. How then can it be
         permitted to transgress this sin for investigative purposes?

            There are several ways in which the poskim interpret this gemara:

            First Approach – The Torah only forbids wasteful emission: The
         Mitzpeh Aryeh (Tinyana, 6) writes that the prohibition of emitting
         semen for naught only applies when the semen goes to waste as it
         is says about Er and Onan, “He wasted [it] onto the ground” (ibid.
         38:9). It says similarly about the generation of the Flood,“For all flesh
         spilled its intercourse onto the ground” (ibid. 6:12). However, emit-
         ting semen for the purpose of testing to see whether a hole in the male
         organ has closed in order to allow him to marry a Jewess is permitted,
         because this is not “wasting” the semen.

            For example, we find that the Rambam writes (Hilchos Yesodei Ha-
         torah 6:7):“A person who removes even a single stone in a destructive
         manner from the altar or from the Temple or from anywhere else
         in the [Temple] courtyard, is flogged.” The poskim learn from this
         wording that it is permitted to break one of the altar’s stones for the
         purpose of repairing it, since this does not involve breaking it in a
         destructive manner. In regard to the prohibition of erasing Hashem’s
         Name too, the poskim write that if ink spills over Hashem’s Name it
         may all be erased [i.e. the Name along with the stain] in order to repair
         it, since this is a constructive, not a destructive erasure. According to
         this logic it is thus also permitted to emit semen for the purpose of
         medical testing since this is not being done in a destructive, wasteful
         manner.

            We find a similar ruling to this in the sefer Kol Yehudah (30), re-
         garding a couple who had been married for a number of years without
         children and the woman asked her husband for a divorce. The phy-
         sicians determined that he was the cause for their failure to achieve
         pregnancy and he sought permission to emit semen for testing, to see

12  1  Medical-Halachic Responsa of Rav Zilberstein
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33