Page 30 - EFI-RAV ZILBERSTIN_VOL 8.EFI-RAV ZILBERSTIN_VOL 8.1A
P. 30

Pg: 30 - 1-Back 21-10-31

         a destructive manner. This is evident from the great severity with
         which Chazal view this sin, prohibiting looking at colored women’s
         clothing, lying supine or watching animals or birds copulate. The
         gemara relates harshly to the severity of this prohibition in maseches
         Niddah (13a). Likewise, the Divrei Malkiel (Vol. V, 157) and the sefer
         Zichron Yosef both write at length to refute this thinking.

            In the case discussed by the Kol Yehudah, he advances another
         reason for permitting it, based upon Chazal’s statement (see maseches
         Shabbos 116a), “Great is peace, for Hashem’s Name, which is written
         in holiness, is erased into water [in the case of an ishah sotah, who, in
         order to allay her husband’s suspicions that she may have committed
         adultery, is made to drink water into which the text of the section of
         the Torah dealing with this topic has been erased], in order to restore
         peace between man and wife.

            The sefer Chedvas Yaakov (Tinyana, 110) also writes about a couple
         who were married for thirteen years without children, and the physi-
         cians said that the wife was healthy and that if there was a problem it
         was with the husband, whose semen they recommended testing. The
         Chedvas Yaakov permitted this based on the gemara in Yevamos, ex-
         plaining that it permits the emission of semen because it is a mitzvah
         to enable him to marry a Jewess, and therefore in this case too, since
         it is a mitzvah that they should not quarrel, it is permitted to obtain
         sperm.

            It should be noted though that the importance of maintaining peace
         cannot be invoked in permitting the emission of semen for testing in
         every situation. In the sefer Kovetz Hanesher (Vol. XI, 2) an incident
         is mentioned where a man became engaged to his first cousin. The
         authorities in that country enacted a law requiring anyone marrying
         the daughter of an uncle or of an aunt to obtain a special permit from
         a physician after the man’s semen had been tested.3 The question

           3.	 On the topic of how halachah views cousins marrying and whether genetic
                disease should be a concern see earlier siman 229 (section entitled ‘Marriage of
                First Cousins or of a Couple Carrying a Defective Gene’) for our explanation of
                the comments of Sefer Chasidim.

14  1  Medical-Halachic Responsa of Rav Zilberstein
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35