Page 90 - EFI-RAV ZILBERSTIN_VOL 8.EFI-RAV ZILBERSTIN_VOL 8.1A
P. 90

Pg: 90 - 3-Back 21-10-31

         that a child born from such insemination is a mamzer and that the
         woman becomes forbidden to her husband. While other poskim dis-
         agree with this, all agree that insemination with Jewish donor sperm
         is forbidden.

            When the sperm is from a non Jew some poskim permit it in prin-
         ciple provided the woman’s husband gives his consent, for there is
         no concern that the child marry his paternal sister from his father,
         nor is there any issue of mamzerus with sperm donated by a non Jew
         [though obviously, it is an unseemly step to take], while other poskim
         forbid even this. According to all opinions however, there are several
         mishaps that can result from artificial insemination with semen from
         a non Jewish donor, for the woman and her husband will certainly
         conceal the fact that this is not actually their child. We shall list some
         of the potential hazards:

                 1.	 If the woman’s husband is a Kohen, they will pass the child
                     off as a Kohen. He and all his subsequent offspring will
                     raise their hands in Birkas Kohanim and in doing so will
                     make untold numbers of blessings for naught. They will
                     also violate the prohibition of non-Kohanim bestowing
                     Birkas Kohanim.
                        This child may be invited to fill the Kohen’s role at a
                     Pidyon Haben, since both he and the baby’s father hon-
                     estly believe he is a Kohen, whereas he not a Kohen and
                     any redemption money he accepts renders the redemption
                     invalid.
                        A male child requires Pidyon Haben even if his true
                     father is a non-Jew but in practice his mother will be em-
                     barrassed to redeem him from a Kohen, since she is pass-
                     ing him off as [her husband’s child and therefore] a Kohen
                     [and as such exempt from pidyon].

                 2.	 In the eventuality that this child one day ends up divorcing
                     his wife, he will write his name in the get as the son of his
                     mother’s husband [whom he believes is his father but] who
                     is not actually his father. Perhaps there is no cause for con-

74  1  Medical-Halachic Responsa of Rav Zilberstein
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95