Page 82 - Countering Trinitarian Arguments With Historical Reference

in the Lord's Name. [This Name is Jesus!] For concerning this also did the Lord say, "Give not that which is holy to the dogs."”
Was the Didache also altered like Matthew 28:19 from “In My Name-Jesus” to a trinity reading by the Catholic Church? Quoting the Didache for support of the Trinity being taught by the early Church is like quoting the “Jehoash Inscription” for support or insight on the early royalty of Judah.
Theology of the New Testament by R. Bultmann, 1951, page 133 under Kerygma of the Hellenistic Church and the Sacraments. The historical fact that Matt. 28:19 and original Jesus name baptism was altered is confessed very plainly. “As to the rite of baptism, it was normally consummated as a bath in which the one receiving baptism completely submerged, and if possible in flowing water as the allusions of Acts 8:36, Heb. 10:22, Barn. 11:11 permit us to gather, and as Did(ache). 7:1-3 specifically says. According to the last passage, suffices in case of the need if water is three times poured [false sprinkling doctrine] on the head. The one baptizing names over the one being baptized the name of the Lord Jesus Christ," later expanded [changed] to the name of the Father, Son, and the Holy Spirit.”
At any rate the Catholic Church wrote many false spurious books and letters to support their non-biblical false doctrines. The primary one of which is the Trinity and Trinity Baptism. Anyone who studies the Didache, the so-called “Apostles Creed”, or any other extra-biblical writings must keep in mind that they are studying false spurious texts and not the real Scriptures. The Didache does not prove that the early Church was Trinitarian. It actually weakens the Trinity argument by quoting such a spurious apocryphal contradictory writing. Students must keep in mind that other false letters, Manuscripts, Codex’s or scrolls may be forged or found later, which reflect false second or third century Gnostic-Hellenistic Trinitarian Arian teachings. We cannot believe everything that may be found and even accepted by scholarly Trinitarian circles. Not everything with green ink on it is necessarily real legal tender or money; nor is every fragment, codex or scroll real Scriptures or teaches Biblical doctrine from the early first Century Church. There are many counterfeits like the Didache. The so-called “Teachings of the Twelve Disciples” “The Two Ways” or the “Didache” is nothing but the word of man that has taken the place of the real Word of God! I know of some so-called Pentecostals that teach this small book to their Churches as Biblical Truth.
Biased Trinitarian Translators placed Plural slants in the Scriptures
The Holy Bible, according to most scholars, was originally written in three different languages. The Torah and Tenach/Tanach or Old Testament was written, for the most part in ancient Paleo-Hebrew, which was Israel’s language down to the time of the Babylonian exile (606-536 BC). The bulk of the Old Testament was written in Hebrew, and without vowel points, or punctuation. Hebrew was also written from right to left. Hebrew is the Israelite dialect of the ancient Canaanite language, which belongs to the Semitic family, and is closely allied to Aramaic. Afterwards, the Aramaic language (which started with the Arameans/Syrians which took the place of the Akkadian
81