Page 175 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 175

160           SAMAGRA  TJLAK- 2  •  THE ORION
             the  hymns  distinctly  speak  of older  hymns  or  bards,  while  in
             ~ig. x. 99. 9 the hymns are said to proceed directly from the puru-
             ,ha or  the sacrificial  pe~sonage. All  that we  can  therefore legiti-
             mately say is  that  the hymns, which contain older traditions and
             legends  e.  g.,  of  the  ~ibhus and  V;i~bakapi,  must  have  been
             composed  in  the  Orion period.  Some  of  the  hymns  may  even
             be  still  older  and  some  later,  but  generally  speaking  we  may
             suppose  that.4000  and  2500  B.  C.  are  the  limits  of  this  period.
             This may require us  to assume the existence of some Vedic verses
             at a time when the Hindus, the Greeks  and  the Parsis lived toge-
             ther.  Some  scholars  may  hesitate  to  accept  such a  conclusion;
             But so far as  I know the conclusion  is  not  inconsistent with the
             results of comparative Philology or Mythology.  Prof. Max Miiller
             in  his  Biographies of wo;ds  ( pp.  188-198 )  gives  a  list of about
             sixty  mythological  names  which  may  be  shewn  to  be  common
             to  Greek  and  Sanskrit. •  If  so  many  mythological  names  can
             be shewn  to be phonetically identical  it is impossible to suppose
             that  no  songs,  celebrating  the  deeds  of these  deities, existed  in
             the  lndo-Gerinanic  period.  Westphal  has  already  proved  the
             exis~ence of poetry in  the  Indo-Germanic period, and Dr.  Kuhn
             has  endeavoured  to  trace  whole  formulae  back to  the  beginning
             of Indo-European poetry.  Verbal  coincidences such  as,  Sk. pada,
             Av.  padha,  Gk. pous,  all  meaning  a  metrical  foot, again point to
             the  ·same  conclusion.  t The  results  of  comparative  Philology
             are therefore,  not only not inconsistent with, but on the contrary
             corroborate  the  conclusions  we  have  independently·  deduced
              from  the  astronomical  references  and  allusions  recorded  in the
              old Vedic literature. But I would not make my  case  rest  on  such
              grounds.  It must  be remembered  that we have  not been speculat-
              ing  in  any  way  about  the  oldest  Vedic periods.  Our conclusions
              have  been  based  on  expre'Ss  statements  and  texts· in  the  Vedic
              literature and  unless  the texts  themselves  are questioned or other
              more  reasonable  interpretations  suggested,  we  shall  not  be
               .  -*  For instance ,t.'ihhtt is  compared to  Greek  01jJleus  Sa1am:i  to  Gk.
              E/~~s, T'rit'-·,z  to Gk.  &th1·os,  D.~.zha!lltzr to Gk. De,z/Jhcnlcs.  I  have already
              ref~rred  to  his  suggestion  regardiug  the  comparison  of  ·vrillt;i!.·api.
              with  the  Eli~·,i}tzi·os. If all  these  deities  existed  in  the  Indo-Germanic
              period, why not .their hymns 1
                 t  See Dr.  Schrader's  Pre-historic  Antiquities  of  Aryan  Peoples,
              Part  I,  Chap.  II;.  pp.  27,  28
   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180