Page 27 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 27

14            SAMAGRA  TILAK- 2  •  THE  ORION

            and  their years  by  the sun", •  and  this appearrs  to  me  to  have
            been  the system in force  in the Indo-Germanic, or at any  rate in
            the primitive Vedic  period.  There is  no  other conclusion  that we
            can  fairly  draw  from  the  facts  and  passages  noted  above.
              There is,  however,  a  further  question,  as  to  whether  the  solar
            year,  with  reference  to  which  these  corrections  were  made,  was
            tropical or sidereal. It is true that the great object of the  calendar
            was  to  ascertain  the  proper time  of the  seasons.  But  the change
            in  the  seasons  consequent  upon  the  precession  of the  equinoxes
            is so exceedingly minute as to become appreciable only after hund-
            reds  of years, and  it is more probable than not that it must have
            escaped  the  notice  of the  early  observers  of the  heavens,  whose
            only method of determining the position of the sun in  the ecliptic
            was to observe every morning the fixed stars nearest that luminary.t
            Under  such  a  system  the  year  would  naturally  be  said  to  be
           complete when  the  sun  returned  to the  same  fixed  star.  Prof.
           Whitney has pointed out that the same system is followed  in  the
           S6rya  SiddbAnta,  though  the  motion  of the  equinoxes  was  then
           discovered.:f:  It is,  therefore,  natural  to  presume  that  the  early
           Vedic  priests  were  ignorant  of the  motion  of the  equinoxes.  No
           early work makes  any mention  of or refers  to  it either expressly
           or  otherwise;  and  the  solar  year  mentioned  in  the  Vedic  works
           must,  therefore,  be  considered  as  sidereal and not tropical.  This
           would necessitate a change in the beginning of the year, every two
           thousand  years  or  so,  to  make  it correspond  with  the  cycle  of
           natural  seasons,  and  the  fact  that  such changes  were  ~troduced
           twice  or  thrice is  a  further proof of the old year being a  sidereal
           one.§  The  difference between the  sidereal and the tropical y'ear is
           20-4 minutes, which cause the seasons to fall back nearly one lunar

               •  Lewis, Hist. Surv . .Aatroa. Anc.,  p.  r8.
               t  Taitt. Br. i. s.  2. 1;  ~ ~ d(<Gi4'fffiq"'S'f4(1  ~" ~ ~ I
           ~~~Rrl~~:~l~r ~;;rq~~~«~tr~~~~
           ~~~I This is still recited  at the Pu-"'ylha-vlchana  ceremony.
               :t  SGr.  Sid. i. 13.  "·  "It is,  however,  not the  tropical  so!ar  year
           which  we  employ,  but the  sidereal,  no  account  being  made  of  the
           precession of the equinoxes. "
               § Tbc  Kfittili::'ls  once  headed  the  list  of  the  Nakthatras,  which
           now begins with Ashvinl.  Other changes are discusse!f in the followiog
           chapters of ~his wol'ii.:.
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32