Page 23 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 23

10          SAMAGRA  TILAK- 2  •  THE  ORION
          and  Yajna  are- declared  to  be  convertible terms, •  and  no  other
          theory has yet been suggested on which this may be accounted for,
           I  am therefore,  inclined  to believe  that the  Vedic  ~i~his kept  up
          their  calendar  by  performing  the  corresponding  round  of sacri-
           fices  on the /sacred fire  that constantly  burnt in their houses,  like
           the  fire  of the  Parsi  priest  in  modern  times.  The numerous sacri-
           ficial  details,  which  we  find  so fully described  in  the  Bni.hma~as,
           might be later innovations, but the main idea of the yearly sacrifice
           appears to be an  old  one.  The etymology of the  word  ritvij ( ritu
           + yaj- season sacrificer ) shows  that even in the oldest days  there
           existed  a  certain  correspondence  between  the  sacrifices  and the
           seasons and what is  true  of the  seasons is  true of the year  which
           according  to  one  derivation  of  samvatsara  ( vas= to  dwell )  is
           nothing but  a period where  seasons dwell, or a  cycle  of seasons.t
           The priests  were  not only  the  sacri:ficers  of the  community,  but
           were  also  its  timekeepers,:t  and these  two  functions  they  appear
          to have  blended into one by  assigning  the  commencement of the
           several  sacrifices  to  the  leading  days  of the  year,  on  the  natural
          ground  that if the  sacrifices  were  to  be  performed  they  must  be
          performed on the principal days of the year.§  Some scholars have
          suggested  that the yearly  satras might  have been subsequently  in-
          vented by the priests.  But the hypothesis derives little support from

              •  See Ait. Br.  li. 17,  which  says  ij~: .lfiilrllfiY:  1  l1o!J~: .-\lso
          Ait. Br. iv.  zz; Shatapatha Br.  xi.  r.  r,  r;  2.  ;.  r :In Taitt. SaJ!t. ii  s.  7.
          3; vii.  s.  7·  4 we  have  liW  Cf  Sfiilrll~:  and again  in  vii.  2.  ro.  3  ~
           JfiiiTilRrl
              t  Cf. Bhlnu Dik~hita'~ Com.  on Amara i.  4,  20. Dr.  Schrader  in his
          Prehistoric Anttquities of the Aryan  Peoples Part  iv, Ch.  vi  (p. 305)
          also  makes a  similar  observation.  He  holds,  on  philological  grounds,
          that  the  conception of  the  year  was  already  formed  in  the  primeval
          period  by  combining  into  one  whole  the  conception  of  winter  and
          summer, which  he believes to be the two primeval seasons.
              t  "In  Rome  the  care of  the  calendar was  considered a  reJiaious
          function,  and  it had  from  earliest  times  been  placed  in the  han~s of
          the  pontiffs."  Lewis's  Bistorical  Survey  of  the  .\stronomy  of  the
          Ancients, p.  2-1.
              §:"Pl-ato  states that the·  months and years are  regulated  in  order
          th;,.t  tile  sacrifices  and  festi\'als  may  corresp()ud.with  .the  ,natural
          seasons; and Ci.cero remarks that  the system of intercalation was  intro-
          duced with  this object." Lewis's His.  Astr.  An c., p.  19 .
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28