Page 19 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 19

6             SAMAGRA  TILAK - 2  •  THE  ORION

           as  a  general  rule,  be absolutely fruitless. •  In  the faflowing  pages
           I  have  endeavoured  to  shew  that  we  need  not  be  so  much  dis~
           appointed.  In my  opinion  there is  ample  evidence-direct  and
           and circumstantial-in the earliest of the Satp.hitAs, to fully establish
           the high antiquity assigned to the Indian literature on geographical
           and historical grounds.t I  base my opinion mainly upon references
           to  be found in the early Vedic works,  the SaiPhitas  and  the Brah~
           ma~as, and  especially  in  the  earliest  of  these,  the  ~ivgeda.  For
           though  later  works  may  sometimes  give  the  same  traditions  and
           references,  yet  any  inference  which  is  based  upon  them  is  likely
           to  be  regarded  with  more  or less  suspicion.  unless  we  can  show
           something in the earliest works themselves to justify that inference.
           Where the Satp.hitAs and the Blihmallas directly speak of the actual
           state of things in  their time, there is,  of course,  no ground to dis~
           believe  the same,  but I  think that even the t-raditions recorded  in
           these  works  are  more  reliable  than  those  in  later  works,  for  the
           simple reason that those traditions are there found in their  purest
           form.  Later  works  may  indeed  be  used  to  supply  confirmatory
           evidence,  where such is available;  but our conclusions must in the
           main  be  based  on  the  internal  evidence  supplied  by  the  Vedic
           works  alone.  Several  Indian  astronomers  have  worked  more  or
           less  on the lines here indicated,  but their labours in this direction
           have  not  unfortunately  received  the  attention  they ·deserve.  The
           late Kri~~pa Shastri  Go~bole published his views pn the antiquity
           of the Vedas in the second and third Volumes  of the Theosophist,-:_
           .and though he  has failed  to correctly interpret some astronomical
           allusions  in  the  Vedic  works,  yet  there is much that is  suggestive
           and valuable in his essay. The late Prof. K. L. Chhatre also appears
           to have held ·similar views on the subject, but he has not published
           them, so far. as I know, in a systematic form. My friend Mr. Shankar
           BA!k-;i$h{la  Dik~hit, who  has  written a  prize essay  in Manlthi  on
           the history of Hindu Astronomy, and who has succeeded in correctly

               •  Weber·'&  History of Indian Literature,  p.  7.
              t  It is  on these gro\lads that Prof.  Weber believes  that the begin-
           Djnga of the  India·n  Literature  "may  perhaps be  traced  bar;k  e\·en  to
           the  time  when  the  Indo  Aryans  still  dwelt  together  with  the  Persa
           Aryans. "  Hist.  Ind. Lit., p. s.
               : .Also published as a separate pampplet.
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24