Page 17 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 17

4            SAMAGRA  TILAK - 2  •  THE  ORION
            of scholars to fix  the age of the  Vcdal by  ~hat may  be called the
            astronomical method, have not y~t met with the  expected success.
            Unfortunately for us,  all the Sanskrit astronomical  words that we
            now  possess,  except  perhaps the Ved&nga  Jyoti~ha, belong to the
            later  period  of.  Sanskrit  literature,  when  the  Greek  influence  is
            perceptible  in  all  its  mathematical  works.  The  different  methods
            of  astronomical  calculations  given  in  these  works,  the  various
            eras that were established in India after  ShAlivthana  or Vikrama,
            the  introduction  of the  BArhaspatya  cycle,  and  the  adoption  of
            the  Greek  division  of the  Zodiac,  make  it  extremely  difficult  to
            correctly  interpret the  astronomical references in the later works;
            while  the  confusion,  caused  by  the  supposed  absence  of any  de-
            finite  statement  as  to  the  character  of the  year  and  the  cycle   ..
            mentioned  in the  Vedic works,  renders it a hard  task  to dedtlce
            a  consistent  theory  out  of the  various  but  stray  references  to
            astronomical  facts  in  the  Ved~c literature.  Take for  instan~;e the
            question  of the commencement of the year in the Vedic calendar.
            There  are  grounds  to  hold  that  the  ancient  Aryas  commenced
            their  year  either  with  spring  or with  autumn,  at  the  equinoxes
            or  at  the  solstices; •  while  the  later  astronomical  works  and
            systems  furnish  us  with facts  which  go  to prove  that  the  year,  in
            the  different  parts  of  India,  commenced  with  almost  all  the
           different  months  of the  year-KArtika,  Mcirgashiqha,t  A~M~ha,
            Chaitra  and  BhAdrapada.  The  discussion  as  to  the  number  of
            the  Nak~hatras and  different  opinions  as  to  their  origin  have
            further  complicated  the  problem;  while  doubts  have  been  raised
            as tp the capacity of the Brihmaps in 1200 B.C. to make  observa-
            tions of solstitial points with astronomical accuracy.: I  shall  have
            to examine hereafter how far some of these objections are tenable.
            For the present it is  sufficient  to  state  that  in  consequence  of
           such  doubts  and  objections,  definite  observations  or  allusions
            to  astronomical  events.  in  the  earliest  works  have  been
           looked  upon  with suspicion by a  good  many  Oriental  scholars,

               •  See infra Chap. II.
               t  Whitney's Silrya Siddhinta :tiv,  16, n.
               :t  Pref.  to Sig. Vol. IV, p. nix.  It is very  difficult  to  understand
           on what grounds this a  sertion is made.   Ancient Vedic  bards had  no
           mathematacal  instruments,  but  still  they  could  have  easily  marked
           when day and night became equal in length.
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22